Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 24, 2025, 06:46:06 pm

Author Topic: Melb Model in The Age  (Read 1957 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

brendan

  • Guest

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Melb Model in The Age
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2008, 07:10:57 pm »
0
Good read

brendan

  • Guest
Re: Melb Model in The Age
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2008, 07:11:58 pm »
0
It is full of factual errors

cara.mel

  • Guest
Re: Melb Model in The Age
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2008, 07:17:30 pm »
0
oh so this thread:http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,5933.0.html is referring to this article?
Thank you brendan :)

What is wrong though with it. I am stupid and don't know much, just say vague things :P

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Melb Model in The Age
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2008, 07:19:23 pm »
0
It is full of factual errors

Still good read.
I didn't form any opinions, just weighed up what was fact and could be evidenced and what what was opinion trying to be tied in as empirical evidence.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Melb Model in The Age
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2008, 11:49:20 pm »
0
Mind you, the editorial about the Melbourne model in that same paper today was rubbish, it said absolutely nothing in several paragraphs.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

ilovesuck

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 107
  • Respect: +1
Re: Melb Model in The Age
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2008, 08:24:49 pm »
0
It is full of factual errors

can you be more specific?

just curious - some of it did seem like a bit of a stretch...