It was really good that the examiners stuck to the stuff that we would have revised: like transcription, translation, replication, also good to see some questions where you have to work out the ratios in the offspring.
Unfortunately that's not the case...
I really bombed out on the bomb question
I put something like, they would have to have to check background radiation that they were exposed to and they would have to check the capability of the nuclear radiation to induce the spontaneous....argh...I stuffed that up hard-core.
Then even the easy questions I stuffed up due to over-concentrating on the ones I was basically guessing at. The RFLP question I knew all along but my answer was really really badly worded. Same with the frog question (what did people say caused their isolation? I said the habitat changes etc. etc.) and for the Neanderthal vs. Homo sapiens I talked about possible gamete mortality; I think they'll accept anything feasable for that (not mating calls though, coz I don't think humans have mating calls). Then the last question, I need to look at that again. I talked a bit about finding fossils of H. sapiens nearby but it wasn't until after the exam that I felt that I could have actually made that answer work. A lot of people I know talked about mtDNA but I thought they meant fossil evidence. Also for the bomb question, a lot of people talked about issues like privacy etc. Is that right or is it more experimental procedure?