Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 27, 2026, 07:47:49 pm

Author Topic: 2008 Psychology Exam 2  (Read 29233 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

nickalaz

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #90 on: November 06, 2008, 07:26:50 pm »
for multi's i got 31 as B - the scones are the unconditioned stimulus, the happiness felt from baking the scones would therefore be the unconditioned response...
and for 32 i got A - d is incorrect because it's talking about a pairing between ucs and ucr timewise, as opposed to the ucs and the cs/ns. therefore it must be A because taste aversion is adaptive (As shown by Garcia etc.)
Q31 is definately B
Q32, it says "the time lapse between the UCS and UCR"
it isn't talking about the pairing.

sitzamurz

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #91 on: November 06, 2008, 07:30:27 pm »
In reply to Eliseblack's comment isn't the the smell of scones the CS and previously the NS and the baking with grandma the UCS, the UCR was happiness...

So wouldn't happiness be the CR

Lulu

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #92 on: November 06, 2008, 07:32:55 pm »
In reply to Eliseblack's comment isn't the the smell of scones the CS and previously the NS and the baking with grandma the UCS, the UCR was happiness...

So wouldn't happiness be the CR

Happiness is both the UCR and CR.

It's just that they are in response to different stimuli (i.e. one being in response to having fun with grandma and the other to the smell)

So I'm pretty sure 31. is A
[english][methods][spesh][psych][chinese][BM]
Aiming for an ENTER of 95+

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #93 on: November 06, 2008, 07:51:10 pm »
agreed about 31

nickalaz

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #94 on: November 06, 2008, 08:06:43 pm »
"having fun"... FUN = the feeling that you get from 'baking cookies' (the UCS) isn't it??

Eliseblack

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 157
  • Evidence is not truth, only evident.
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #95 on: November 06, 2008, 08:10:09 pm »
for multi's i got 31 as B - the scones are the unconditioned stimulus, the happiness felt from baking the scones would therefore be the unconditioned response...
and for 32 i got A - d is incorrect because it's talking about a pairing between ucs and ucr timewise, as opposed to the ucs and the cs/ns. therefore it must be A because taste aversion is adaptive (As shown by Garcia etc.)
Q31 is definately B
Q32, it says "the time lapse between the UCS and UCR"
it isn't talking about the pairing.

the time lapse between ucs and ucr doesn't matter though - either way the ucs provokes the ucr, it's the pairing of the cs with the ucs that timing is relevant for.. am i just getting myself muddled up now?

nickalaz

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #96 on: November 06, 2008, 08:12:25 pm »
hmm im thinking you're right about the happy/fun questions. god thats SO trivial

with taste aversion, they always talk about how the UCR can come a few days later (ie from eating bad food)
but with CC, they say that there can't be a huge delay, otherwise they aren't associated with each other

wait.. i give up, im confused too now

Eliseblack

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 157
  • Evidence is not truth, only evident.
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #97 on: November 06, 2008, 08:17:35 pm »
hmm im thinking you're right about the happy/fun questions. god thats SO trivial

with taste aversion, they always talk about how the UCR can come a few days later (ie from eating bad food)
but with CC, they say that there can't be a huge delay, otherwise they aren't associated with each other

wait.. i give up, im confused too now

hmm, it gets weirder the more you think about it..
taste aversion - time can be ages between pairing of ucs and cs for there to still be an association formed.. but i didn't think it was really important between the ucs and the ucr.. they're paired already.. argh, weird weird. does this discount A though?
taste aversion is usually adaptive..

rh

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 304
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #98 on: November 06, 2008, 08:25:24 pm »
i knew the multiple choice was too good to be true.

99% sure i got q's 29-32 wrong. lol. :<

Nick

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #99 on: November 06, 2008, 08:29:21 pm »
Hey Guys!


Just to clarify with question 9- I think it's perfectly acceptable to have suggested classical for part A of the question and operant for part B. In part A, to me it seems as though they are directly referring to classical conditioning without a doubt. The examiners are simply trying to trick you- and at the same time, cover all bases by testing both types of conditioning in the one question.
Bachelor of Arts (Psychology) @ The University of Melbourne

mskwmskw

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #100 on: November 06, 2008, 08:31:25 pm »
would it also be perfectly acceptable to have suggested operant conditioning for question 9 part A or just classical?
ENTER: 80 plus please
ECO 38+
HHD 38+
PSYCH 38+
ENGLISH 32
FURTHER 33
RE 31

Nick

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #101 on: November 06, 2008, 08:37:16 pm »
I'd be inclined to go with classical only. Anything is possible though. It's very tricky and designed to catch you out unfortunately.
Bachelor of Arts (Psychology) @ The University of Melbourne

sisqo1111

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #102 on: November 06, 2008, 08:42:52 pm »
a psych teacher at my school said def not classical though! he said it had to be operant. he has been teaching it for over 30 years, so ill assume he must be correct?

Eliseblack

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 157
  • Evidence is not truth, only evident.
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #103 on: November 06, 2008, 08:44:51 pm »
a psych teacher at my school said def not classical though! he said it had to be operant. he has been teaching it for over 30 years, so ill assume he must be correct?

it fits too well with cc, your teacher's gotta be mistaken..

Nick

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
Re: 2008 Psychology Exam 2
« Reply #104 on: November 06, 2008, 08:55:17 pm »
Nah it's CC. He's stuffed it up.
Bachelor of Arts (Psychology) @ The University of Melbourne