uhh, not avoiding it! How many times do I have to say that I do not FOCUS on it, it's still a part of my essay, just not a huge part. And yes, Salt Lesson is not as acerbic as his other works, however, could that be because it is directed to his daughter and is taking on a more fatherly role rather than a judge/activist role as he does in his other poetry. The Shed is entirely sub concious I feel, writing about his writing and the "house" soon to be built, suggests a hope that soon his writing will provide a safe place for the animals rather then the makeshift "shed" that they must endure for the moment. While I would generally focus on his metalanguage I would still mention his rambling enjambment and minimal use of full stops. Yes, there are parts of his work that are mellow, but these are the exception rther than the rule and I use the language within these examples to support my points, rather than the structure.
Also, because we have 13 poems to analyse, that counts as the "work" not 'perpherial light'- although I have read it and yes mellowness does show up... sometimes.
I don't "avoid" talking about rhyme/rythym/structure (as I have said before)- I just don't focus on it because I don't see it as a resounding feature of his work, nor do I base my intepretation on it for the same reasons