Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 06, 2026, 07:57:41 am

Author Topic: Official Economics Exam Discussion  (Read 32180 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #30 on: November 07, 2008, 06:18:47 pm »
I put increased participation rate

champorado

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 774
  • f yeh.
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #31 on: November 07, 2008, 06:19:21 pm »
Haha, I totally forgot about MER.

I put something about foreigners.

For BP I put increased childcare subsidies.

Nerves are an awful thing.

chikopapi

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #32 on: November 07, 2008, 06:19:50 pm »
Was the question like 'Why is the unemployment rate still high despite blah blah blah?"

AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #33 on: November 07, 2008, 06:24:51 pm »
Cheers costa.

What did people put for examples of budgetary and microeconomic policies implemented since 2005 that have affected the supply side of the economy??

I think I put...

Budgetary - infrastructure spending.
MER - IR reforms.

Heh, really struggled with the micro cause all of the ones I knew were implemented like before 2000. Pretty sure I'll lose some marks here. :/

LOL EXACTLY MAN.

I didn't finish. :( But I'm more than happy with the answers I didn't do. I absolutely gunned that 8 mark question.

I got D

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F

m08

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #34 on: November 07, 2008, 06:25:42 pm »
Was the question like 'Why is the unemployment rate still high despite blah blah blah?"

yep
and i had an increase in the participation rate as the answer

champorado

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 774
  • f yeh.
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #35 on: November 07, 2008, 06:26:36 pm »
it was

The economy has contiuously grown, but the unemployment rate is still 4%. This is due to.
a) something about school leaving age
b) something else
c) participation rate has increased
d) old people are retiring

chikopapi

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #36 on: November 07, 2008, 06:27:48 pm »
Nice, its participation rate yeah?

chikopapi

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #37 on: November 07, 2008, 06:30:07 pm »
What was with the distribution of income question with the Lorenze curve. I think I put the one if income increases for the high income earners increases, the lorenze curve moves left....

AppleXY

  • Life cannot be Delta Hedged.
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2619
  • Even when the bears bite, confidence never dies.
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #38 on: November 07, 2008, 06:30:18 pm »
I put  A.

I just thought Participation and UN were totally different things. You could have super high participation yet have high unemployment (structural unemployment).

Raising compulsory school age creates a greater skilled workforce which can decrease thee UN

2009 - BBus (Econometrics/Economics&Fin) @ Monash


For Email: click here

Need a question answered? Merspi it!

[quote="Benjamin F

champorado

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 774
  • f yeh.
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #39 on: November 07, 2008, 06:35:21 pm »
Yeah. For the last Q, I got D (which is the option you outlined).

I got participation rate for that q as well.

I almost got the real wages one wrong. Lucky I had time to go over MC.


Apple: If the unemployment rate is constant in a time when jobs are being created, it means that the amount of people who want to work is also increasing. Raising the school age will reduce the participation rate, as people who might have wanted to work are forced to stay in school. There was a similar question in the insight trial exam.

m08

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #40 on: November 07, 2008, 06:39:55 pm »
What was with the distribution of income question with the Lorenze curve. I think I put the one if income increases for the high income earners increases, the lorenze curve moves left....

urgh! i read that one wrong!

Mark

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #41 on: November 07, 2008, 06:44:18 pm »
I thought overall the exam was pretty easy, although the last question was a shocker. It seems like no one knew what to write for it - I guess that means they're going to have to mark it pretty easy?

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #42 on: November 07, 2008, 06:49:17 pm »
I thought the last question was which of these is FALSE. which wood be C.

chikopapi

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #43 on: November 07, 2008, 06:51:12 pm »
which was YEAH, THAT IT DOES NOT SHIFT LEFT, IF IT shrinks left, the space between curver decreases, becoming more equal

if u increase wealth for high income earners, becomes more inequal, shifts RIGHT not LEFT, so D is right.

costargh

  • Guest
Re: Official Economics Exam Discussion
« Reply #44 on: November 07, 2008, 06:52:44 pm »
If anyone has the proper wording that wood be good.^^^