Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

March 08, 2026, 12:51:59 am

Author Topic: Equating gradients  (Read 6591 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #15 on: November 08, 2008, 08:21:51 pm »
0



Like that droodles?

provided neither "g" and "k" are functions of "o"

if they both are:





wait... too far?
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #16 on: November 08, 2008, 08:23:11 pm »
0
Yes Mao, you clearly took it too far.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #17 on: November 08, 2008, 08:24:31 pm »
0
:P
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

droodles

  • Guest
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #18 on: November 08, 2008, 08:25:05 pm »
0
ARE YOU A VICTIM OF RACIAL SLUR?

DO YOU ENJOY MATHS?

WELL HERE'S A SOLUTION...DERIVE THEM AWAY!

provided neither "g" and "k" are functions of "o"

if they both are:






NOW YOUR PROBLEMS ARE 'SOLVED'

bec

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 689
  • Respect: +1
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #19 on: November 08, 2008, 08:26:08 pm »
0
oh no he went there

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #20 on: November 08, 2008, 08:29:45 pm »
0
completely random, but here's an insight I had when I was deriving 'gook':

the multiple products rule:





thank you for your time.



which means, the derivative of gook can be re-expressed as



it appears the racial slur is invincible..... :'(
« Last Edit: November 08, 2008, 08:34:02 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #21 on: November 08, 2008, 08:32:22 pm »
0
I PREFER INTEGRATING RACIAL TENSION INTO THIS FORUM THANK YOU VERY MUCH











EQUALS
GOOOOOOOOOOOK
Well maybe not quite.

So um...disregard this whole thread...? haha
And yes, this is what bec gets for derailing her own thread.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


droodles

  • Guest
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #22 on: November 08, 2008, 08:36:43 pm »
0
apparently at mhs the students get erections after they see 50/50 for any of their sacs


shinsjuxusijxxxznarutofannerd confirm?

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #23 on: November 08, 2008, 08:43:12 pm »
0
apparently at mhs the students get erections after they see 50/50 for any of their sacs
You should some students' reaction when they LOSE a mark.

shinsjuxusijxxxznarutofannerd confirm?

Where'd the Naruto come from? o_O Clearly that description fits ed_saifa better.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


Toothpaste

  • pseudospastic
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Member #10
  • Respect: +26
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #24 on: November 08, 2008, 08:45:27 pm »
0
真実
translate: jp -> en
then find romaji.

vce08

  • Guest
Re: Equating gradients
« Reply #25 on: November 08, 2008, 08:52:20 pm »
0
50/50 is clearly standard at MHS