Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 25, 2026, 11:04:47 am

Author Topic: Kinematics  (Read 1266 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nerd

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • Respect: +51
Kinematics
« on: November 29, 2008, 09:42:41 pm »
0
Please help me with the attached question...
2008
Hebrew - 33 (scaled 44)   |   Maths Methods - 45 (scaled 48)

2009
Specialist Maths   |   Chemistry   |   English   |   Biology   |   Further Maths

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2008, 10:40:52 pm »
0
This one's quite tricky..
Intuitively, define O to be s=0, the vertically upwards to be positive s, and vertically downwards to be negative s. Also, let be when the stone hits the lift, and let be the depth at which the stone hits the lift. Therefore we have for the stone; , , , , while for the lift, we have , , ,

Using , we get
Solving on a CAS or solver or whatever; we get

But remember how we defined t of the stone as ? This means we reject 4.19 as the answer as this would lead to a negative time, and take 9.39

Subbing , we get
Therefore the answer is 33 metres (I hope; kinematics has never been my strong point)
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


nerd

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • Respect: +51
Re: Kinematics
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2008, 10:50:08 pm »
0
Wow! That's right shinjitsuzx! Thanks so much.

That sure is a complicated question....
2008
Hebrew - 33 (scaled 44)   |   Maths Methods - 45 (scaled 48)

2009
Specialist Maths   |   Chemistry   |   English   |   Biology   |   Further Maths