Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 31, 2026, 02:44:55 pm

Author Topic: TrueTears question thread  (Read 74825 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #330 on: May 01, 2009, 11:22:52 pm »
0
Thanks kamil and Mao, I understand it now.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #331 on: May 01, 2009, 11:26:24 pm »
0
Also, general rule: You cannot change the domain of a function by algebraically manipulating it:

consider y=x with domain R.
has domain R/{0}

by writing we havnt changed the domain of the original function, just said that our new form is only true for and hence our new form is not the complete picture:

This is analogous to ur case. does not mean that u magically changed the domain of the function but that ur new form only allow values for which the condition holds.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #332 on: May 01, 2009, 11:28:02 pm »
0
Also, general rule: You cannot change the domain of a function by algebraically manipulating it:

consider y=x with domain R.
has domain R/{0}

by writing we havnt changed the domain of the original function, just said that our new form is only true for and hence our new form is not the complete picture:

This is analogous to ur case. does not mean that u magically changed the domain of the function but that ur new form only allow values for which the condition holds.
True, true. very true.

Thanks for explanation again! :coolsmiley:
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #333 on: May 03, 2009, 11:35:22 pm »
0
And also this question:

The equation of a curve C is , where is a constant

a) find

C does have a tangent parallel to the y axis

b) show that the y coordinate at the point of contact satisfies

c) Hence show that

stomped on part c lol
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #334 on: May 03, 2009, 11:44:21 pm »
0
the equation in b is a quadratic, it has at least one solution (as per part a), hence the discriminant must be greater or equal to 0

Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #335 on: May 03, 2009, 11:49:54 pm »
0
Thanks Mao and kamil (MSN)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #336 on: May 03, 2009, 11:58:24 pm »
0


Find the derivative of with respect to
« Last Edit: May 04, 2009, 12:40:02 am by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #337 on: May 04, 2009, 12:23:11 am »
0
Consider ,

If x > 0 , find
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #338 on: May 04, 2009, 02:14:14 am »
0
Consider ,

If x > 0 , find
I remember this from one of my UMEP tests :)
So for , we have that
.
Thus is constant. Taking gives

and so for all ,
.

Other interesting inverse trigonometric identities:
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #339 on: May 04, 2009, 08:31:31 am »
0
Thanks humph!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #340 on: May 05, 2009, 01:55:05 pm »
0
To do that without calculus:

since x>0 and arctan has domain

Let
, this can be verified by constructing a right angle triangle with adjacent and opposite sides of and respecticely, and an angle of

taking inverse tan of both equations and adding them gives QED.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2009, 02:35:50 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #341 on: May 05, 2009, 04:08:13 pm »
0
^^^ thanks kamil!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #342 on: May 15, 2009, 04:23:23 pm »
0


I don't think there is a way to integrate it without using

What do you think?
« Last Edit: May 15, 2009, 04:25:16 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #343 on: May 15, 2009, 10:00:22 pm »
0


remember that

the relationship between cot/csc in many respects resembles tan/sec
« Last Edit: May 15, 2009, 10:02:20 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #344 on: May 16, 2009, 01:01:20 pm »
0
Thank you so much Mao
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.