Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 20, 2025, 04:21:44 pm

Author Topic: TrueTears question thread  (Read 66210 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #45 on: December 28, 2008, 06:07:46 pm »
0
yeah lol
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #47 on: December 28, 2008, 07:47:31 pm »
0
o thanks very much
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #48 on: December 28, 2008, 09:32:19 pm »
0
and just another Q, i got

How can i simplify that further?

My book does...



why do u multiply by ? its not rationalising or anything is it?

Why can't u multiply it by ?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

vce08

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #49 on: December 28, 2008, 09:35:31 pm »
0
cos the base becomes 1 - (cos(x))^2 which is equal to (sin(x))^2 when u use the book thingy

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #50 on: December 28, 2008, 09:59:26 pm »
0
and just another Q, i got

How can i simplify that further?

My book does...



why do u multiply by ? its not rationalising or anything is it?

Why can't u multiply it by ?












So there are two ways to simplify it. The first way is "nicer" because the denominator is simpler. But it doesn't make that much of a difference...
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #51 on: December 28, 2008, 10:09:21 pm »
0
ahh thanks humph
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #52 on: December 29, 2008, 07:04:15 pm »
0
could someone please list the newton notation way to differentiate , and . Like for product rule in newton notation it's just . My book doesn't make it very clear how to differentiate the inverse of sin, cos, tan. yeah so pretty much could someone please teach me how to differentiate those 3 inverses. lol
« Last Edit: December 29, 2008, 07:10:15 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Matt The Rat

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #53 on: December 29, 2008, 07:22:19 pm »
0
There's a couple of different ways to do it.

For the derivatives are given on the formulae sheet.

When they become slightly more complex (ie, then either than chain rule or implicit diff could be used

Chain Rule: Make the substitution and then

Implicit Diff: Use that info to make a right angled triangle (with as the hypotenuse, as the opposite side and and as the appropriately placed angle) as you'll need to work out for the derivative.

I haven't finished the examples completely but just shown the groundwork of how to approach the problem.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #54 on: December 29, 2008, 07:30:59 pm »
0
yeah, im just beginning the differentiations for inverse trig functions, i think i get how to do the basic differentiations now, but theres one question in the an example i dont quite get.

Differentiate with respect to x
 

Let and

so x



after simplification it becomes

then this is where i don't understand. My book says if

and if .

How do u get 2 answers for ? And how do u get the restrictions for , ie and .
« Last Edit: December 29, 2008, 07:32:47 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Matt The Rat

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #55 on: December 29, 2008, 07:42:40 pm »
0








The domain of the derivative is to do with where the function is defined.

As its domain initially was within then






The terminals are not included as you would be dividing by 0 in the derivative.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #56 on: December 29, 2008, 07:46:36 pm »
0
ahh yes i think i understand, but wat about the 0, how do u know to split it at and

and how come if . How do u get the negative?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #57 on: December 29, 2008, 09:28:38 pm »
0
Should be

Now remember that

VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #58 on: December 29, 2008, 10:12:15 pm »
0


This is probably perfectly acceptable, but it might be pursued further:

Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #59 on: December 30, 2008, 04:36:04 pm »
0
ah thanks.

also,

1. show that the parabola with equation has no points of inflexion.

2. Determine the points of inflexion for the following function:







so point of inflexion occurs when . But this is not a point of inflexion, why is that?
« Last Edit: December 30, 2008, 05:00:24 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.