"accounting for 80% of all drug- or alcohol-related deaths."
I'm sure tobacco related deaths aren't on the spot sudden deaths!!!
I was going to edit to make my point clearer.
Your statistics are interesting, shocking in some respects, but it's logical structure is as good as Andrew Bolt reasoning i.e. pretty crap. The statistics don't make a comparison between I suppose the burden of tobacco/alcohol usage compared to cannabis usage, which is what you want if you want to say that tobacco is more dangerous than cannabis.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I *think*
Glockmeister is saying to take into account the number of people who use tobacco/alcohol compared to cannabis. The fact that it accounts for 80% of deaths does not in of itself support the assertion that tobacco/alcohol is more dangerous than cannabis. If a lot more people used tobacco/alcohol then obviously a lot more people are going to die from it. To get any sort of meaning from those statistics, you'd need to find out what percentage of people use tobacco/alcohol on a regular basis compared with the percentage of people who use cannabis on a regular basis, and work out what percentage of users of each drug die.
Apologies if I've got that completely wrong Glockmeister, didn't get much sleep last night
