Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 02, 2025, 02:19:17 pm

Author Topic: Markov chains  (Read 2269 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Markov chains
« on: January 15, 2009, 12:02:32 pm »
0
I came across those questions where it asks you to find out the number of people in group A and group B 4-5 months from now where the current month is labelled i and you seek to find the numbers in i + 4 or so. However, I found it pretty time-consuming with full working and as MathsQuest are known for elaborating on the steps involved at times, does anyone have any shorter way of doing it than doing it one month at a time? Thanks

Also, just another thing, whenever we come across a probability question where the question doesn't define X for you, should be defining X just to be sure or should you just label X as the particular distribution you are looking at and just continue on. I've been defining X but the textbook examples haven't so I just wanted to check.
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

Rebecca.tutoring

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2009, 12:09:48 pm »
0
Are you doing CAS? If you are, you can use matrices to work out those kinds of questions.

Also, just another thing, whenever we come across a probability question where the question doesn't define X for you, should be defining X just to be sure or should you just label X as the particular distribution you are looking at and just continue on. I've been defining X but the textbook examples haven't so I just wanted to check.

I'm not sure what you mean by "label X as the particular distribution you are looking at"... But basically, you're right - you should always define variables ("Let X be the event that it rains").
Offering English tutoring in 2009
99.9 ENTER, 50 in Eng...State Library or at your house (inner SE suburbs)

http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,8703.msg111258.html#msg111258

Specialising in Eng but I can also tutor methods (SS 45) and chem (40)

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2009, 12:14:25 pm »
0
Are you doing CAS? If you are, you can use matrices to work out those kinds of questions.

Also, just another thing, whenever we come across a probability question where the question doesn't define X for you, should be defining X just to be sure or should you just label X as the particular distribution you are looking at and just continue on. I've been defining X but the textbook examples haven't so I just wanted to check.

I'm not sure what you mean by "label X as the particular distribution you are looking at"... But basically, you're right - you should always define variables ("Let X be the event that it rains").

nup I'm not doing CAS but the book has some stuff on matrices that I sort of skipped owing to tiredness but I'll look over it again. And yeah thanks for the clarification.
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2009, 04:47:49 pm »
0
I dont think normal methods actually has matrices in the study design, so you dont have to learn it if your are bit iffy about it.
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

Roflmao

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 343
  • Im Always Watching...
  • Respect: +2
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2009, 04:39:24 am »
0
I think i have heard of this :P

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2009, 02:21:36 pm »
0
I think i have heard of this :P

knowing Ahmad, you probably have..
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2009, 02:24:50 pm »
0
I came across those questions where it asks you to find out the number of people in group A and group B 4-5 months from now where the current month is labelled i and you seek to find the numbers in i + 4 or so. However, I found it pretty time-consuming with full working and as MathsQuest are known for elaborating on the steps involved at times, does anyone have any shorter way of doing it than doing it one month at a time? Thanks

The only straight forward way is through matrices, and it really isn't that hard. I have a short guide on matrices somewhere in the notes section, you'll find it under methods [it covers a few other things for CAS, you don't necessarily need to know them, but they can become useful]

Otherwise, giant massive stupid tree diagrams are for you.

Also, just another thing, whenever we come across a probability question where the question doesn't define X for you, should be defining X just to be sure or should you just label X as the particular distribution you are looking at and just continue on. I've been defining X but the textbook examples haven't so I just wanted to check.

If you find defining X works better for you, then by all means go ahead and do so, but I do believe they accept both of the following forms:

Pr(X=4)=....
Pr(4 heads)=...

I personally find the latter easier [saves me defining stuff]. Since in VCE you only learn univariate probability, it isn't THAT necessarily to define it.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2009, 03:30:11 pm »
0
Right thanks everyone.

Just another point, do we need to know the equation for a normal distribution curve or just know how to find probabilities using the standard normal distribution? Also, do we get the cumulative normal distribution table for the tech free and tech active exams?
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

kurrymuncher

  • Guest
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2009, 03:38:13 pm »
0
 You dont get the table for normal dist in the tech free or tech exams. Because there was no normal distribution last year, Im guessing there will be this year, so just remember the normal distribution curve equation anyway, although I doubt that there will be any questions on it in the tech free exam.
or just know how to find probabilities using the standard normal distribution?
You must know how to do this.

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2009, 03:41:33 pm »
0
or just know how to find probabilities using the standard normal distribution?
You must know how to do this.

Yeah of course, given that there's like two exercises dedicated to doing it in my textbook :)
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

kurrymuncher

  • Guest
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #10 on: January 18, 2009, 03:46:10 pm »
0
What book are you using?

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2009, 03:48:56 pm »
0
MathsQuest
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

pHysiX

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
  • RAWRRRRRR!
  • Respect: +2
  • School: Wellington Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2009, 06:14:15 pm »
0
since you ain't doing methods cas, don't stress too much about markov chains.

they are real easy. don't worry. markov chains is just about being bothered to plot the info into a 2/3 stage tree diagram. if i were u, i'd focus on binomial stuff. well that's how i found normal methods anyway =]
2010: BBiomedSC/LLB
2011: BE (ECSE)/LLB

2011: Dean's Honours (Engineering)
2012: Dean's Honours (Engineering)

"Hey sweety! I love you like e^x"
"Always exponentially increasing and never equal to zero"
<3

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Markov chains
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2009, 09:33:03 am »
0
since you ain't doing methods cas, don't stress too much about markov chains.

they are real easy. don't worry. markov chains is just about being bothered to plot the info into a 2/3 stage tree diagram. if i were u, i'd focus on binomial stuff. well that's how i found normal methods anyway =]

They weren't necessarily hard, just really time consuming, I just needed to check whether MathsQuest had missed some shortcut. Thanks anyway :)
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics