Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 20, 2024, 06:45:50 pm

Author Topic: HSC Physics Question Thread  (Read 1043056 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #465 on: July 06, 2016, 04:13:03 pm »
0
Is this Quanta to Quarks?

Yup it is! I did medical physics, so I can't be of much use for that option unfortunately... except for the Quantum physics I've done at Uni!
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #466 on: July 06, 2016, 04:14:13 pm »
+1
does nuclear fusion also release energy?

Decided to jump in the conversation :P

For two smaller atoms to fuse, they require a lot of energy and high temperatures. So, when they are fused together(for instance two hyrdogen atoms fuse together to produce deutrium), there is excess energy left over, which is emitted by the nuclei in the form of gamma radiation.
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

conic curve

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Respect: +2
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #467 on: July 06, 2016, 04:48:23 pm »
0
Yup it is! I did medical physics, so I can't be of much use for that option unfortunately... except for the Quantum physics I've done at Uni!

Did jamon study quanta to quarks?

Also did you study industrial chemistry?

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10150
  • The lurker from the north.
  • Respect: +3108
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #468 on: July 07, 2016, 12:11:28 am »
0
Did jamon study quanta to quarks?

Also did you study industrial chemistry?

I studied Medical Physics just like Jake did, but I bet there are lots of people hanging around who did Quanta  ;D

conic curve

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Respect: +2
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #469 on: July 07, 2016, 11:02:29 am »
0
I studied Medical Physics just like Jake did, but I bet there are lots of people hanging around who did Quanta  ;D

Damm.....What if we ask things in Quanta to Quarks which require a high level of understanding? (I don't think I will be but I think others might)

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10150
  • The lurker from the north.
  • Respect: +3108
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #470 on: July 07, 2016, 11:21:57 am »
0
Damm.....What if we ask things in Quanta to Quarks which require a high level of understanding? (I don't think I will be but I think others might)

We hope that someone else can answer!! Jake and I have some background knowledge with regard to the content, Jake more than me, so we'll handle what we can, otherwise we hope others can help out  :)

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #471 on: July 07, 2016, 11:30:06 am »
0
Afraid that I can't assist this problem too much since I did astro

conic curve

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Respect: +2
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #472 on: July 07, 2016, 11:31:51 am »
+1
We hope that someone else can answer!! Jake and I have some background knowledge with regard to the content, Jake more than me, so we'll handle what we can, otherwise we hope others can help out  :)

I hope that as well

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #473 on: July 07, 2016, 11:43:31 am »
0
I hope that as well

I've done a fair amount of the Quanta curriculum, so I'm sure we'll be okay :)
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

Loki98

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Respect: 0
  • School: mfhs
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #474 on: July 07, 2016, 12:36:46 pm »
0
Need help with this question,
The distance to the star alpha centuari is 4.367 light years as measured from Earth. Using a relevant equation, explain how a rocket could complete the journey from earth to alpha centuari in 3.28 years.

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10150
  • The lurker from the north.
  • Respect: +3108
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #475 on: July 07, 2016, 12:52:44 pm »
0
Need help with this question,
The distance to the star alpha centuari is 4.367 light years as measured from Earth. Using a relevant equation, explain how a rocket could complete the journey from earth to alpha centuari in 3.28 years.

Hey Loki! The equation that this question mentions is the length contraction formula:



Essentially what is happening here is that if the rocket travels at a relativistic speed, the distance between the earth and Alpha Centauri (with respect to earth) contracts with respect to the frame of reference of the rocket. That is, the astronauts actually would believe the distance to be shorter due to length contraction. Thus, with respect to the earth, the astronauts would actually arrive earlier than they would have if we didn't take length contraction into account, because the distance travelled with respect to the rocket is shorter.

The answer to your question would explain that principle, preferably being a little more succinct  ;) Does that make sense?

Loki98

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Respect: 0
  • School: mfhs
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #476 on: July 07, 2016, 01:11:31 pm »
0
Hey Loki! The equation that this question mentions is the length contraction formula:



Essentially what is happening here is that if the rocket travels at a relativistic speed, the distance between the earth and Alpha Centauri (with respect to earth) contracts with respect to the frame of reference of the rocket. That is, the astronauts actually would believe the distance to be shorter due to length contraction. Thus, with respect to the earth, the astronauts would actually arrive earlier than they would have if we didn't take length contraction into account, because the distance travelled with respect to the rocket is shorter.

The answer to your question would explain that principle, preferably being a little more succinct  ;) Does that make sense?


Yea it makes sense now. But how would i prove that the time taken would be 3.28 years?

conic curve

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 714
  • Respect: +2
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #477 on: July 07, 2016, 01:13:57 pm »
0
I've done a fair amount of the Quanta curriculum, so I'm sure we'll be okay :)

Fantastic  :D

jamonwindeyer

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 10150
  • The lurker from the north.
  • Respect: +3108
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #478 on: July 07, 2016, 01:28:10 pm »
0

Yea it makes sense now. But how would i prove that the time taken would be 3.28 years?

Oh, good point! This is a little beyond what would be asked in the HSC, but it would look like this. First, you'd use the speed equation:



This allows you to link the length quantities in the equation above to the times given in the question. You get:



We substitute those quantities into the length contraction formula and that lets us solve for the velocity:



I skipped a few steps in that algebraic working, let me know if you need me to clarify it, but this should give you the direction!  ;D

This working is subject to inaccuracy, I've never actually done this calculation before! However, the answer seems sensible to me, and note that this is pretty bloody quick  ;) again, it is unlikely you'd be asked to specifically provide the calculation in the HSC, and I think the question was looking for something a little more general  ;D

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: Physics Question Thread
« Reply #479 on: July 07, 2016, 01:36:53 pm »
0
Oh, good point! This is a little beyond what would be asked in the HSC, but it would look like this. First, you'd use the speed equation:



This allows you to link the length quantities in the equation above to the times given in the question. You get:



We substitute those quantities into the length contraction formula and that lets us solve for the velocity:



I skipped a few steps in that algebraic working, let me know if you need me to clarify it, but this should give you the direction!  ;D

This working is subject to inaccuracy, I've never actually done this calculation before! However, the answer seems sensible to me, and note that this is pretty bloody quick  ;) again, it is unlikely you'd be asked to specifically provide the calculation in the HSC, and I think the question was looking for something a little more general  ;D
Using S=D/t does pop around in the HSC I think. It's pretty rare though because it targets high band 5 in my opinion - have to know when to apply what formula, and in what order to apply them.