snip
I doubt you'd lose a mark for it as the marking feedback didn't state that better responses did not extrapolate, but a good rule of thumb is unless you know for CERTAIN that the relationship is linear all the way to infinity (generally by an equation), then don't extrapolate.
Here's an example of why extrapolating when unsure could give you very wrong results.
(This is a physics example and not a chemistry example, I know, sorry, but it conveys my point)
As you can see, when we plot the electric magnetic field magnitude with distance of a conducting sphere, it starts out very linear, but once the distance is greater than the radius of the conductor (R), it decreases exponentially. So, if you were given 5 points that all lied between 0 and R, you'd believe that it was linear, however, since we aren't CERTAIN of the equation, we shouldn't extrapolate, because in this case, we would be
very wrong. This is similar to why we don't do it in the chemistry question.
As for Q20 in 2016, AAS works by comparing the same wavelength before,and after to see how much of the intensity was absorbed, you wouldn't get any proper results comparing the intensities of 2 different wavelengths, because well, they are different, and different wavelengths absorb differently.
Lastly, HFC's are the offical way for improving, and yeah you are correct, however the equation would be CH4 + Cl2 -> CH3Cl + HCl. This is producing hydrochloric acid! As the question wants the one that reduces the environmental impact the most, I'd go with B.
Hope this helps!