In 2007 HSC exam for chemistry, there was a question regarding "explain one benefit of car batteries lasting several years" and the notes from marking centre recommended that "Better responses clearly linked the benefit to a property of lead or sulfuric acid. Weaker responses did not give a specific benefit, but rather general statements that could have many meanings, such as ‘convenient and reliable’. The better responses explained such words in the context of their answers." I have some trouble trying to relate the property of lead or sulfuric to the question. Please Help Jake!!!
Hey Happy Physics Land (love the name by the way).
Great question, because it's the perfect example of the fact that sometimes teachers mark question in a way that is arbitrary and, to be frank, just wrong. The question, word for word, is "Explain one benefit of car batteries lasting several years." (from the 2007 paper, question 20b). This is framed in relation to an image of a Lead-Acid battery, however really the question doesn't ask specifically about a car battery with components that are Sulfuric acid or Lead. So really, an answer such as durability, convenience etc. should answer the question.
For a two mark question, make sure you talk about the positive attribute AND the reason its beneficial (ie. convenience of not having to replace battery regularly, resulting in greater costs to consumer, and safety, so that the battery doesn't die mid-drive).
The way the answer that you quote is phrased makes it seem like the question was "Explain how the components of the above battery make them suitable for car batteries". I really think the markers got that wrong, and in more recent exam papers you won't find such obvious misrepresentation of what the question was asking for.
The answer to the question "Explain how the components of the above battery make them suitable for car batteries" has many answers, including
1. The battery does not discharge much voltage whilst not in use, unlike many other forms of re-chargeable batteries
2. Results in a high voltage-discharge when required
3. Not easily subject to internal damage through corrosion etc.
However, like I've said I don't think these answers should have been required given the question. That being said, including as much information as possible is always a good idea when answering Chemistry questions, and so throwing one of these in could be a good idea if you want to play it safe.
I hope this helps: remember that you're only supposed to
answer the question and, in this case, I think the marker got it wrong.
Jake