Pretty sure core question 2 is D as you cant really order the ages, its like male and female
Here are my answers for graphs and relationsSpoiler1.B
2.A
3.D
4.D
5.C
6.E
7.E
8.B
Pretty sure core question 2 is D as you cant really order the ages, its like male and female
But the ages have a natural order as 'under 50' comes before '50 and over'. It makes sense to order them.
I got E for question 24
But the ages have a natural order as 'under 50' comes before '50 and over'. It makes sense to order them.Omg thank god! I changed my answer to B last minute
Pretty sure core question 2 is D as you cant really order the ages, its like male and female
Here are my answers for graphs and relationsSpoiler1.B
2.A
3.D
4.D
5.C
6.E
7.E
8.B
I got D here as well - You are either under 50 or over 50If you're either one of the other, doesn't that make it ordinal?
If you're either one of the other, doesn't that make it ordinal?
It's the same as having Yes or No, or Bad, Good and Excellent. If it was all specific age data, then I think it would be nominal.
I got a few different answers
Core.
21. B
24. E
Matrices
8. E because you are calculating Rows not Columns
Geometry
1. A
2. D
3. E
4. A (not 100%)
5. A
6. E
7. C
8. D (not 100%)
[/spoiler]
Bad good excellent is ordinal. Yes or no is nominalThat's.. right.. but.. aw
Can anyone give me an explanation on Q8 for Core?
Can anyone give me an explanation on Q8 for Core?
how do you do question 8 from networks?
Can someone please explain why question 7 for matrices is d rather than c!
Matrices
8. E because you are calculating Rows not Columns
to calculate which is dominant you add columns not rows
core: q12 - why is it d? i said e
networks - q3 - why is it c? i said b
does anybody have a copy of the exam?? our school doesn't let us take it :( pls help
Pm me if you're on Facebook I can take pictures of my exam :)
q 24 - e - because its still the middle of the annuity (whats she has given the banks) the Fv is also negative!!!
With Q24 Core, if you accept E, you overpay on the annuity giving you a negative value for your FV.
If you accept C, you work out the PV to be $180,000 and substituting the values into the solver they should be able to match with the stats (positive FV).
Please explain to me why the last question graphs and relations was B - 7.5 ???
I have come to understand that it could really be any answer if justified... because we aren't told what k is?
If you got B please tell me why, my answer was C and is explained in the picture attached. ;)
Please explain to me why the last question graphs and relations was B - 7.5 ???
I have come to understand that it could really be any answer if justified... because we aren't told what k is?
If you got B please tell me why, my answer was C and is explained in the picture attached. ;)
For Q24 of Core this is what I did (I got E!)
We aren't told what the current value is so the value at 5 years is used as the PV
Financial Solver -
N: 5(years) * 12(months) = 60
I: 5.2%
PV: 130,784.83 (at 5th year)
Pmt: ??? = $-3460.14911597 (money away is always negative)
FV: 66,992.27 (at 10th year)
PpY: 12
CpY: 12
Makes sense to me, I think E was correct from the start. No doubts.
For Q24 of Core this is what I did (I got E!)
We aren't told what the current value is so the value at 5 years is used as the PV
Financial Solver -
N: 5(years) * 12(months) = 60
I: 5.2%
PV: 130,784.83 (at 5th year)
Pmt: ??? = $-3460.14911597 (money away is always negative)
FV: 66,992.27 (at 10th year)
PpY: 12
CpY: 12
Makes sense to me, I think E was correct from the start. No doubts.
You can work out the value of 'k' by substituting in the coordinates (10,800) as you know after 10 minutes she has reached the shop (800m from house). Thus 'k' works out to be 80 so your new equation is 'distance'=80*t. Let distance=600 as you know it is a continuous piece-wise/hybrid function. t=(600)/80=7.5.
I think PV should be positive as you receive money. If PV is negative you are paying the receiver money.
But I said PV is positive
Apologies, was referring to PMT. PMT is positive if you receive money, negative if you give money.
Yes, totally agree with that but we were taught that when the initial PV is not known, make PV and FV negative, which I didn't show on the previous reply but if that was done then this would be the answer obtained:
Financial Solver -
N: 5(years) * 12(months) = 60
I: 5.2%
PV: -130,784.83 (at 5th year)
Pmt: ??? = $3460.14911597 (money away is always negative)
FV: -66,992.27 (at 10th year)
PpY: 12
CpY: 12
Ah. I've always known that if you are still owed money, FV should be positive. If you now owe money, FV should be negative. In this case your original amount still owed (PV) is negative so you are stilled owed $130,784.83 but if you have FV as negative, you now owe $66,992.27 since you have overpaid.
the first step is to find k using the fact that it took her 10 mins to walk 800 metres so 10k=800 making k 80 and then from there you use 80a=600 (as line 2 and 3 must be equal where they meet) and find a as 7.5
Does anyone know how to work out Core Q6 - there were two unknowns so I had no idea how to get the equation. I ended up guessing another point on the graph and using power regression on CAS to get the rule. Chose E but I have no clue how
Hey everyone!
The answers that are below are purely provisional - point out the mistakes! If you did a module we don't have please post it! We also have a A Copy of the 2016 VCE Further Maths Exam 1
When we have consensus on a module we'll note it down in this original thread. Let's get some teamwork going!
(If someone has a copy of the exam, that would be great too - personal message me if you have one!)
CoreSpoiler1. B
2. B - challenge has been made; is it D or B? Give us your reasoning.
3. A
4. E
5. C
6. D
7. E
8. C
9. C
10. B
11. A
12. D
13. C
14. A
15. E
16. D
17. E
18. C
19. A
20. D
21. B
22. B
23. D
24. C challenge has been made; is it C or E? Give us your reasoning.
MatricesSpoiler1. C
2. D
3. E
4. B
5. C
6. B
7. D
8. A Some people are challenging this answer, claiming answer E instead.
NetworksSpoiler1. B
2. C
3. C
4. E
5. A
6. C
7. B
8. B
Graphs and RelationsSpoiler1.B
2.A
3.D
4.D
5.C
6.E
7.E
8.B
GeometrySpoiler1. A
2. D
3. E
4. A (not 100%, what's your answer?)
5. A
6. E
7. C
8. D (not 100%, what's your answer?)
Alright i just want some clarification on some answers.
Core:
Q9: Clarification
Q13: why can't it be D, isnt it increasing after the fluctuations?
Q21: Shouldn't it be D if its $80000, with $4000 per year? Unless i misunderstood it
Thats all, be kind ;D
Reading through this thread sounds like question 24 from Core is leaning towards C, still a bit of a debate though. I went E - anyone have a clear/close to definite answer??
Reading through this thread sounds like question 24 from Core is leaning towards C, still a bit of a debate though. I went E - anyone have a clear/close to definite answer??
I got A for Matrices Question 8
Me too! I've heard some stuff about having to add columns but this dominance matrix was like any other, so hence we had to add the rows.Remember this and the next exam are both weighted 33%
I'm also confident than 24 in core is C! Because an annuity present value is always negative.
I think I got 36/40 on that exam - have I lost my chance at a 40+?
Remember this and the next exam are both weighted 33%
If you keep it up I'm sure you have a pretty good chance! Work hard for Monday *~*
I got between 34-37 depending on the challenges... Praying it's 37 LOL but knowing my luck it'll be the 34.
Graphs & relations
Question 5, could someone please explain why it's only C. The gradientstill touches point B and either could be the maximum. So shouldn't it be the whole line?
Anyone able to explain their answer for Graphs and Relations Q6 the y=kx^n question? Thanks.
Intense cramming here I come!Haha wow congrats :D I hope your next exam is as successful.
I believe you'll get the 37!! What questions are you not so sure about?
I made 1 silly mistakes and 2 questions I guessed because I had no idea! The last was 2 from core - I chose ordinal and nominal (D) but I'm convinced now that they're both ordinal!
What modules did you do?
Looks like I fucked further 7 wrong on the first bloody exam >:(Hey there, anything over 80% is extremely honouring. Maybe you have high expectations but this is still a promising score, and I hope it strives you to do your best in exam 2. Both exams are weighted equally, so I believe you can pull it up in the next one c:
Graphs and relations (module 4)
Can someone please explain to me how they did the last question? ... I had no idea how to do it and just ended up guessing
First, at T=10, you use the third equation as per the constraints, the thir equationn being k*t
You know that the journey was a total of 800m, and that it took her 10 minutes to reach the shop, or to cover the 800m. The fact that she went at a different pace or stopped for a while is irrelevant, as the Hybrid funtion gives the distance from her house at any particular point, and regardless the distance from her house at T=10 is 800m.
To work out the average rate of travel, divide the distance by time, or 800/10=80, which gives you your K value. Next, you know that at T=a, the distance is 600m, as per the second equation in the Hybrid funtion. Thus, k*t bceomes k*a=600, a=600/k, k=80, then a=600/80=7.5
can someone explain to me how to work out Q8 on the Graphs and Relations module??? thanksTwinsniper offered an appropriate explanation for Q8 in Graphs while I was composing this one - but here is my explanation anyway.
Haha wow congrats :D I hope your next exam is as successful.
Did you figure out how to do those questions?
I did matrices and networks!
Unsure:
Core Q2 (picked B, OP says maybe D)
Core Q24 (picked C, OP says maybe E)
Matrices Q8 (picked A, OP says maybe E)
Wrong:
Core Q8 (picked B) - I ruled out the right answer (C) first because I didn't even think about it haha
Core Q11 (picked C)- I totally forgot to log(y) on my CAS and calculated the regression without it
Matrices Q6 (picked C) - silly mistake, flew straight over the zero
Can I please get an answer for question 4 geometry!!
I got E. 6.35am but im seeing conflicting results! Someone who could confirm this answer would be appreciated
Twinsniper offered an appropriate explanation for Q8 in Graphs while I was composing this one - but here is my explanation anyway.
The equation for the final section of the graph is distance = kt. This is the same as y=mx+c where c=0.
Since y=mx+0 goes through the origin, so must distance = kt
Since the line distance = kt joins (0, 0) and (10, 800), the gradient of this line is 80
That means k=80 and the equation of the line, between t=a and t=10, is given by distance = 80t
Now find the value of t where this line distance = 80t crosses the line distance = 600
That is, solve 80t = 600.
This gives the value of t=a=7.5.
Definitely think you got 37 :-)My friend did that with Q7 too x]
Core Q2 I answered D but I 100% understand why it's C :) makes sense, under 50 and over 50 does have some sort of natural order! You wouldn't order it as: over 50, under 50 imo.
Core Q24 I chose C! I also checked with my teacher and she agreed it was C! People mixed their negative and positives up! But pretty sure annuities are treated as investments...?
Matrices Q8 was 100% A! It was a normal dominance matrix so I don't understand why some people were adding columns? You always add rows :)
The ones I got wrong were:
Q7 - picked D because I didn't read the 'at least 2' properly 😂 forgot to add the 1!
And 2 questions from graphs and relations!
So unless some magic happens and vcaa accepts 2 answers for Q2 (here's hoping!) Sitting on an average score :/
Thankfully I understand them now :D Hopefully we can smash Exam 2!
Twinsniper offered an appropriate explanation for Q8 in Graphs while I was composing this one - but here is my explanation anyway.
The equation for the final section of the graph is distance = kt. This is the same as y=mx+c where c=0.
Since y=mx+0 goes through the origin, so must distance = kt
Since the line distance = kt joins (0, 0) and (10, 800), the gradient of this line is 80
That means k=80 and the equation of the line, between t=a and t=10, is given by distance = 80t
Now find the value of t where this line distance = 80t crosses the line distance = 600
That is, solve 80t = 600.
This gives the value of t=a=7.5.
HEEECCCKKKKK I didn't do as well as I thought!!! This is scary!!! Will the next maths exam be harder or easier????
Also do both exam marks contribute towards ATAR or do they add them together?
Has any1 got any tips for my second maths exam???
But this is not accounting for her remaining stationary for x minutes? I don't think you can use the average travel rate to find a... This question is flawedLet's talk in terms of y and x.
Core Q6 is histogram , are you sure it the right question?
Ahh sorry I meant Linear Q6!
Hey Guys! I just found this and now I'm confused again about Q2 for core. If you scroll down a bit you'll see an example with 3 categories - one is age which is '18 and under' and 'over 18.' The page says that it is a nominal variable. https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat504/?q=book%2Fexport%2Fhtml%2F1
Thoughts?
Hey Guys! I just found this and now I'm confused again about Q2 for core. If you scroll down a bit you'll see an example with 3 categories - one is age which is '18 and under' and 'over 18.' The page says that it is a nominal variable. https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat504/?q=book%2Fexport%2Fhtml%2F1
Thoughts?
I assumed that the ages have been categorised and similar to that of post codes which are nominal , thats my argument
Don't trust American Websites....!!! I'm going with this definition (see attachment) ...Core Question 2 ANSWER B
I doubt they'll accept 2 but maybe they can just take out the question and hence, all answers are given one mark. Ik they did this once previously
This is so confusing!! Maybe vcaa will be kind and accept two answers
Don't trust American Websites....!!! I'm going with this definition (see attachment) ...Core Question 2 ANSWER B
Re: Core Question 2Yeah makes more sense to me. For eg, if you had year levels in a school. It's natural to call the year levels in increasing order...you won't say year 9, then year 2, then year 12.
The definition is not based on a Yes or No answer. It's based on whether you can place the categories in a NATURAL order. In this case, the natural order for Under 50 and Over 50 is youngest to oldest.
Q24 is definitely C.
I taught students that in this case, you'd set PV as negative (since you're "losing" money into the bank), PMT as positive (since you're receiving that money from the bank) and FV as positive.
N:60
I%: 5.2
PV: -130784.93
PMT: ? --------> = 1500.000019
FV: 66992.27
PY: 12
CY: 12
If you want to convince yourself that it works, you could try setting N to 1. Clearly, after only a month, the balance of the annuity won't have come down by much. But it will show you that FV should go in as a positive, even though PV was negative.
N: 1
I%: 5.2
PV: -130784.93
PMT: 1500
FV: ? --------------> 129851.6647
PY: 12
CY: 12
FV comes out as a positive number, so it stands to reason that we should enter FV as a positive number in this question!
The incorrect (I think) option E comes from setting FV as negative. Which essentially says that the bank is going to pay out until the annuity is $0, but then keep paying out until Mai owes the bank $66,992.27!
Th st Michaels teacher did
N:60
I%: 5.2
PV: 130784.93
PMT: ? --------> = -3460
FV: 66992.27
PY: 12
CY: 12
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/the-80000-question-that-divided-vce-further-maths-students-20161028-gsdd7o.html (2:20 into live stream)
Yes i agree however people probs got both pv and fv+ as its mid term not initial investment so they assumed you take the FV of the 5yr period
of which it was + 130k then just put it as +130k for next period as pv
even though it is mid term , it is the new pv hence making it -ve ?
Yep but thats where people went wrong. Confusion on if its + or - as its mid term.
Yea but how do you know you are right ??
What if your argument is incorrect?
I wasn't trying to say i was correct, i was just saying where people went wrong in ending up with 3460.
If it turns out to be 3460 then fair play
you rekon they will give al right for confusion?Probably not, like the question itself can be solved by many different ways. I was stumped by it for around 20 minutes before i used my calculator's 'generate sequence' function with the formula u(n)=1.0043 x u(n-1) + D, initial term 130784.93 and subbing in D as each of the options. Checking the 61st term the closest value to the required is when D is 1500.
Probably not, like the question itself can be solved by many different ways. I was stumped by it for around 20 minutes before i used my calculator's 'generate sequence' function with the formula u(n)=1.0043 x u(n-1) + D, initial term 130784.93 and subbing in D as each of the options. Checking the 61st term the closest value to the required is when D is 1500.
For 24 on core, I got E. 3460.
After 5 years, you have $130, 784.93 in your account, you did NOT invest that much. You had that much after 5 years.
if you invested that much into a new annuity account, then the pv would be negative. but you already had that.. so its a positive.
This is what I did:
n= 60
i= 5.2
pv= 130, 784.92
pmt= x
fv= 66,992.27
py/cy= 12
comes out to be -3460
For 24 on core, I got E. 3460.
After 5 years, you have $130, 784.93 in your account, you did NOT invest that much. You had that much after 5 years.
if you invested that much into a new annuity account, then the pv would be negative. but you already had that.. so its a positive.
This is what I did:
n= 60
i= 5.2
pv= 130, 784.92
pmt= x
fv= 66,992.27
py/cy= 12
comes out to be -3460
For 24 on core, I got E. 3460.
After 5 years, you have $130, 784.93 in your account, you did NOT invest that much. You had that much after 5 years.
if you invested that much into a new annuity account, then the pv would be negative. but you already had that.. so its a positive.
This is what I did:
n= 60
i= 5.2
pv= 130, 784.92
pmt= x
fv= 66,992.27
py/cy= 12
comes out to be -3460
In regards to question 2 from core...
My further teacher has told me throughout the year that some (or all, I can't remember) of the authors of the Cambridge book (Peter Jones, Michael Evans, Kay Lipson, and Kyle Staggard) are part of a group who write the end of year exam and are some of the head-honchos of further maths - is this true?
If so, surely the answer has to be B considering their textbook has a nearly identical question where they say the variable is ordinal.
The answers is B, it has been confirmed by an further maths examiner.
A current examiner? Does this mean that D will be marked wrong (bc some people reckon vcaa will mark both right or just eliminate the question)?
so let's hope they reward both answers :D
As someone who selected B, I hope they don't ;)
Im still saying D
because of it being categorised in a nominal styled manner
similar to that of postcodes
Age surely has a natural order though, I find it hard to justify otherwise.
sorry this is sort of related, i have the further exam 1 with me, how do i start a new post so i can post it and have people help me mark it???\
For those who think $3460 is correct for Q24
If it was right Mai would receive 60*$3460= $216000 in total payments over 5 years and would still have $66992.27 left over, which combined is more than double the $130784.93 which is clearly not realistic.
Always worth reviewing your answers to see if they make sense.
Good luck to all on Monday
But if you think about it , they are not being specific are they
either you are or your not
yes or no
Nominal
How specific does it need to be? It doesn't change the fact that there is a clear order between the variables
Answers have been released on the first page of this forum , we are accusing some challenging question here ,
Q.4 Geometry pre confident its E, Sun rises from the furthest east point(180e) until closing in on equator (0)
So sun hits M(150deg) at 6:03 and then will travel 8deg to 142e(8x4), Arriving at 6:35am (due to there being 1 Tz)
For a simpler example, Melbourne is at 144 E and perth is at 116E. If melbourne and perth were on one 1tz and sun would rise at 6am in melbourne it wouldn't rise in perth until (28x4) 1hr 52mins later (7:52)
Anyone disagree with my logic of Q4 geometry being E or have i missed something?
I'm fairly sure Geometry question 4 was A, I was told this by a few teachers.
You work it out by finding the time difference which was 32 minutes, and then looking at the position of the towns in contrast to Greenwich. Since Portland is closer to Greenwich and the time difference increases positively when traveling East from GMT, it makes sense that Portland would have a time of 5.31AM, with Mallacoota following this 32 minutes later as it is further East. It's the same concept as how New Zealand is ahead of us by around 2 hours - as it is even further East from Victoria. My idea was although the sun rising is an aspect of the question, if you think of the time in Mallacoota being 12.03AM for example, Portland will still be 32 minutes behind and thus be 11.31PM, as it is situated closer to Greenwich. I may be wrong though, I guess we will just have to wait and see.
Can I please get an answer for question 4 geometry!!
I got E. 6.35am but im seeing conflicting results! Someone who could confirm this answer would be appreciated
Geometry Question 4 is E,
so the difference is 32 mins but is it before or after is the question.
Lets think about it from a different angle in this scenario perth and melbourne are on same time zone if the sun rises at 7 in melbourne it will rise at approximately 10 in Perth, 3 hours later which reflects the real life timezones. comparing the latitudes of each, Perth is 115°51″ E and Melbourne is 144° 57' E so as you more towards 0 degrees east the sun rise is later and due to in the question Portland is closer to 0 degrees east than Mallacoota the sun rise will be later and therefore the 32 minutes must be added giving 6.35 am.
Question 8 Geometry is D,
I did this without touching my calculator and ill explain how.
in the question we are given the linear scale factor is 2 therefore k2=4,
A single black flag has 4x the area of a white flag and since there are more black flags the total area of black flags is greater 4 times the total area of white flags.
A is wrong less than 4x, B is wrong must be more than 4x, C is wrong less than 4x, E is wrong less than 4x. This only leaves D as an answer and therefore the correct one.
Regarding question 2 all ordinal data can have questions asked to where it can be viewed nominal to prove something is nominal you must show it cant be ordinal not that it can be nominal. Blood Pressure most agree is ordinal which in itself shows that the argument you cant have groups in ordinal data is wrong as low, normal and high are groups with grouped ranges of blood pressure. and age groups can therefore be ordinal its a question of can something be ordinal with only 2 categories? The definition of that is the answer to whether B is right or D is right.
(http://dissertation.laerd.com/types-of-variables.php) The definition of ordinal in this link says "Just like nominal variables, ordinal variables have two or more categories. However, unlike nominal variables, ordinal variables can also be ordered or ranked."
Investigating the quote 2 categories can be ordinal but it needs to be able to be ordered or ranked. Theres an easy way to order by ages so does that make B correct?
I'm confident that Q2 of core is D, but I can see VCAA taking a simplistic view and saying the answer is B, or alternatively, remove the question entirely.
edit: Also, it's been discussed to death, we will found out the answer in just over a month, so let's move on :P
Yet again the if you think about it
Yes yu are less than 50 or no
Hence nominal
I think perception plays a part
Can someone explain the perpetuity graph ?
Can someone explain the perpetuity graph ?A perpetuity is an investment where the interest earned is the payment you received. Thus, the balance of the loan never changes as whatever interest is earned is paid out.
A perpetuity is an investment where the interest earned is the payment you received. Thus, the balance of the loan never changes as whatever interest is earned is paid out.
Though there is an increase in the perpetuity's value right ?
Only if the payment received after each compounding period is smaller than the interest calculated. If it's the same, the perpetuity will maintain its value indefinitely.
But for Q 21 core
How do u know ?
If a question mentions perpetuities then its value will remain constant, and as its value is initially $80,000, it will remain so for the life of the perpetuity.
Only if the payment received after each compounding period is smaller than the interest calculated. If it's the same, the perpetuity will maintain its value indefinitely.Then it's not a perpetuity :P
so it B or D? Q2You'll only find out on dec 12th, move on
why is core question 11 not E.
why is core question 11 not E.