Does anyone have a copy of the exam? Happy to provide worked solutions as I tutor methods
The first half was suspiciously easy... The second half was like a punch in the face. I guess the last few questions will really be those deciding marks for the top scores :/
Also did you guys simplify the first question? Worth one mark but I think I over-simplified. RIP :-\
The first half was suspiciously easy... The second half was like a punch in the face. I guess the last few questions will really be those deciding marks for the top scores :/
That just about sums it up lol. I got close to half of it done in 15 minutes, I was thinking it was way to easy, then I got a surprise when I actually had to think through the questions at the end, how the heck do we do all of that stupid integration at the end. I could have done it but it would be way too over complicated.All that integration at the end made me want to walk out, that was probably the hardest exam I’ve done for methods I’ll be happy with a 37 at this point.
missed the last page, spent to long before I realised I had the symmetry on the (N+1)pi question the wrong way round ....Don't worry too much, the last page only had 2 marks :)
wow literally thought I was the only one. It was going great the whole way through and then bam last two questions slaughtered me
I'm so surprised that the very last question was only 2 marks with how much working out was required.
that was the easiest test in a long time 40/40. phewLOL, liar
Yeah, exactly, which makes me think that there must have been a more simple way of solving it. A friend was saying that you could use values found in parts a-d or something but honestly I have no idea. Guess we'll be waiting for the exam to be published :/
Hi everyone. Hope you all did well in your exam 1.Also, do I have to justify the fact that I have no absolutes? The domain x>1 and I thought that absolute values when integrating weren't needed since it's out of the methods study design.
One of the questions gave us a derivative and told us to find the original function.
I Wrote:
But I now realise that a simpler form is:
Will I still get full marks even though I wrote the first one?
(Posted on another)
LOL, liar
What did everyone get for K?
Don't ever disrespect the king
LOL, liar
What did everyone get for K?
LOL, liarPretty sure first k = 1 and second k = ln(2)
What did everyone get for K?
Also, do I have to justify the fact that I have no absolutes? The domain x>1 and I thought that absolute values when integrating weren't needed since it's out of the methods study design.
Yeah, exactly, which makes me think that there must have been a more simple way of solving it. A friend was saying that you could use values found in parts a-d or something but honestly I have no idea. Guess we'll be waiting for the exam to be published :/There was a simple way. You can use symmetry properties and the fact that it was translated by 3pi to easily find the integrals using your answers from a and b
Anyone know what the A+ cutoff might be? How did you guys find it in comparison to previous years? I feel like 2016 and 2017 were dead easy in comparison to this one.Imo it was comparable to 2016 and 2017. So around 34-35?
The probability questions seemed way too easy. Although I could just be a big idiot.I got b=-1/2. Do you remember how many marks they were?
The one with the Standard Deviation (sorry I forgot the question number) the answers I got were
part a: pr(X>6) = 1/2
part b: b=5
2 questions:
1: did I get that right?
2: Did I need to show more working if it is right?
part b: b=5
The probability questions seemed way too easy. Although I could just be a big idiot.
The one with the Standard Deviation (sorry I forgot the question number) the answers I got were
part a: pr(X>6) = 1/2
part b: b=5
2 questions:
1: did I get that right?
2: Did I need to show more working if it is right?
Imo it was comparable to 2016 and 2017. So around 34-35?
Didn't that question say Z < b? In that case it wouldn't be 5 because it would have to be standardized as a result. I also got pr(x>6) = 0.5 as well.
I got b = -1/2
Mean was 6 SD was 2. Half SD (1) up is 7.
Z greater than 0.5 = Z less than - 0.5 .. Not too sure
Disagree with that. I think you'll find that very few students will get full marks on the last 3/4 pages, whilst in 2016/17, there were only a couple of questions where the majority got full marks.What do you think the cutoff will be? Personally, I thought 2017 was slightly harder that this years. I'm in no way stellar at methods but I think I got full marks for the last 3/4 pages.
Imo it was comparable to 2016 and 2017. So around 34-35?No way the exam 1s from the last years are so much easier than this years one. I was aiming for low 30s, I ended up getting mid 20s for this exam... Bummer. Oh well, only thing left to do is try and smash tomorrow's one :/
No way the exam 1s from the last years are so much easier than this years one. I was aiming for low 30s, I ended up getting mid 20s for this exam... Bummer. Oh well, only thing left to do is try and smash tomorrow's one :/Every year people say that their exams are harder than previous years cause they do it under stressful exam conditions. It would be great if someone who didn't do methods this year gave their opinion on this years exam difficulty.
Wait a sec... *facepalm* You are right
Every year people say that their exams are harder than previous years cause they do it under stressful exam conditions. It would be great if someone who didn't do methods this year gave their opinion on this years exam difficulty.Yeah I realised that as I was doing trials they always seemed easier, the stress gets to ya. However, my methods teacher (Head of Mathematics) and assessor for a really long time also said that it was hard in comparison to previous years.
OOF. This ain't it chief. What even is 1 mark?
Surely somebody has the answers though. Like a pdf or some shit. Surely send me it if you got it.
what would a 32 be?A (likely) or very high B+ (less likely)
Would leaving the answer to Question 2 as "...loge(2x-2) - loge(2)...", and Question 8d as loge(4)/2 cause me to lose marks?yes a good assesor would remove marks since your answers must be in the simplest forms.
LMAO that last page was a joke. As if I would spend that long on a question worth two marks.
A (likely) or very high B+ (less likely)damn :(
yes a good assesor would remove marks since your answers must be in the simplest forms.What do you think about my previous question?
Does anyone know what the equation for l1 on the last page was?Check the second post of this thread... #Answersheet...
What would I be looking at with
~90% SACs top 20 ranks at a selective school
34/40 Exam 1
70/80 Exam 2
What do you think about my previous question?I thought overall the exam was "standard' or a touch harder than that - there was a good mix of easy accessible questions and a couple to separate out the top scores.
How'd you all find it?
Typed up solutions about to be posted. Stay tuned.
EDIT: Solutions Posted. Please let me know of any suggestions.
EDIT 2: Sorry, formatting stuffed up on first upload. Re-uploaded with fix.
Correction, 28/40 Exam 1 :(dont worry man, :( it was a crazy exam
I really wish your solutions are 100% correct, I'd be over the moon! Can someone please confirm with certainty?i dont think so, i spoke to my teacher about this.
Can someone please also confirm whether pi(4n+1) and -pi(4n+1) will get me full marks for 9i and 9ii respectively?
If it doesn't say to put down the x-intercepts, do you still have to do it? I just assumed that because it asked for endpoints and the minima that you didn't need to. Ehhhhyea u should be fine
I only wrote pi and - pi for question 9. Would that give me consequential marks...same
Didn't write the 2pi n
For the question about giving the definite integral I wrotewithout putting in values, could i still get the mark?
Every year people say that their exams are harder than previous years cause they do it under stressful exam conditions. It would be great if someone who didn't do methods this year gave their opinion on this years exam difficulty.
Lots of people have already done solutions. I thought I'd contribute :D.
Was definitely an interesting exam. A+ cutoff will be 33-34 / 40 I think.
Well done. MathType + Word for the win!
What software did you use to draw the graph of f(x) in Q3b? I use FX Graph but your one has the exact same axes as the VCAA one. Extremely jealous :P
If it doesn't say to put down the x-intercepts, do you still have to do it? I just assumed that because it asked for endpoints and the minima that you didn't need to. EhhhhBecause the previous question made you work out the x-ints, they didn't require it on the graph. Otherwise it would be double dipping on the marks.
Well done. MathType + Word for the win!
What software did you use to draw the graph of f(x) in Q3b? I use FX Graph but your one has the exact same axes as the VCAA one. Extremely jealous :P
What do you think the cutoff will be? Personally, I thought 2017 was slightly harder that this years. I'm in no way stellar at methods but I think I got full marks for the last 3/4 pages.
Holy fk that exam was an absolute massacre.
I got 9pi^2 - 36pi for that last question and realised too late that it was negative...
The utter absence of statistics and composite function - related questions was actually disgusting.
Also can anyone explain to me why for that inverse function question, you had to reject the negative answer? I thought you have to leave the plus-or-minus sign in there.
Final question, what grade would a 27~29/40 be on that exam?
Cheers.
Can any mods/admins here tell my why my solutions just got taken down for "copyright" reasons?
> They're my solutions.
> They don't contain any part of the actual exam book.
> Yes, they're on another site, but I put them there too.
I understand if I've broken any rules - I'd just like to know exactly what I did wrong :)
Holy fk that exam was an absolute massacre.I thought the exam was comparable to past exams so you would be roughly around the borderline of a B+ and an A.
I got 9pi^2 - 36pi for that last question and realised too late that it was negative...
The utter absence of statistics and composite function - related questions was actually disgusting.
Also can anyone explain to me why for that inverse function question, you had to reject the negative answer? I thought you have to leave the plus-or-minus sign in there.
Final question, what grade would a 27~29/40 be on that exam?
Cheers.
Sorry mate, I took them down. We've been really disappointed by the constant breaches of copyright on the exam discussion threads and thought that yours was another. Many apologies for taking the solutions down. I'll try to restore them so that everyone here can benefit from your excellent work.
No worries! I completely understand. To avoid them being taken down again (we'll be doing methods exam 2, the specialist exams, chemistry and physics as well), how should I show in future posts that they're in fact our solutions?
No worries! I completely understand. To avoid them being taken down again (we'll be doing methods exam 2, the specialist exams, chemistry and physics as well), how should I show in future posts that they're in fact our solutions?
Sorry mate, I took them down. We've been really disappointed by the constant breaches of copyright on the exam discussion threads and thought that yours was another. Many apologies for taking the solutions down. I'll try to restore them so that everyone here can benefit from your excellent work.
Last year, a copy of the exam was posted in the very first message in the thread within minutes of every math exam. No one complained then. What changed?
Holy fk that exam was an absolute massacre.I reckon I got around 28-29/40 as well. Based on previous years that will get you a low A. I reckon this year's was much harder than previous years (I've done extensive practice and error correcting), so it might be more of a mid A this year.
I got 9pi^2 - 36pi for that last question and realised too late that it was negative...
The utter absence of statistics and composite function - related questions was actually disgusting.
Also can anyone explain to me why for that inverse function question, you had to reject the negative answer? I thought you have to leave the plus-or-minus sign in there.
Final question, what grade would a 27~29/40 be on that exam?
Cheers.
Thanks for posting your solutions, too, crouchie! :)You're welcome. It was a lot of fun to type up, and to see dantraicos do something similar too.
You're welcome. It was a lot of fun to type up, and to see dantraicos do something similar too.
Well-typeset maths is just gorgeous to look at, isn't it?
8)
Haha, yeah, MathType is great. I was thinking of doing it in LaTeX but thought I'd stick to the style of all the other TWM Publications stuff.
The graph was done in Microsoft word. Insert chart, scatter with smooth lines. Because I write exams, I've memorised the VCAA style guide :P
Here's a link to a word doc containing just the graph for you to analyse :D
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pghxs6okrlwv0iv/MME1%20Graph.docx?dl=0
You're welcome. It was a lot of fun to type up, and to see dantraicos do something similar too.
Well-typeset maths is just gorgeous to look at, isn't it?
8)
Thanks for that Dan. That graph has so many components to it, I'd never get to that level. It's literally a bunch of lines, dashes etc put together to create that. I wish I had the patience to smash that out, but I use FX Graph to do all that (though the results just aren't as pretty as yours) ;)
Hi,
For question 7, part a) was worth 3 marks, my thinking was correct, however due to a silly error in finding the derivative I did not end up with the correct coordinate. I then used the incorrect coordinate for the next question (worth 2 marks). Does consequential marking have an effect here? Will I pick up maybe 1-2 marks in the 3 mark part at least? Or will my score for that question be 0/5?
Thanks in advance :)
Also, huge thanks to the multiple people who posted up solutions, much appreciated!
Does anybody know the mark allocation for each question? Trying to see how I went but the solutions don't say how much each question was worth. Thanks
yo if anyone has a copy of the exam could they please post how many marks each question was worth, trying to add up my marks
thanks! :)
Hi EveryoneSorry, from this year copies of VCAA exams will not be posted on ATAR Notes as these exams are subject to copyright.
Any hope to find a copy of the MM Exam 1?
My teacher confirmedHold up - every solutions thingo I've seen has +/-pi(2n+1) (also the answers I got)
9ai: pi(4n+1)
9aii: -pi(4n+1).
Do you guys think that will be accepted? If not, will i at least get 1 mark of out 3 for the working?
My teacher confirmedYeah, I don't know why you're teacher confirmed those solutions, unless I'm missing something.
9ai: pi(4n+1)
9aii: -pi(4n+1).
Do you guys think that will be accepted? If not, will i at least get 1 mark of out 3 for the working?
Yeah, I don't know why you're teacher confirmed those solutions, unless I'm missing something.
My teacher confirmed
9ai: pi(4n+1)
9aii: -pi(4n+1).
Do you guys think that will be accepted? If not, will i at least get 1 mark of out 3 for the working?
It would be 4n if n was any integer, but because the question explicitly states that n is even (part i) and n is odd (part ii) the correct answer is the one involving 2n.
I've done a mock of solutions here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hGcrpUJ8ZDRwrNhTRcALI2slH4exFqTL/view?usp=sharing
It would be 4n if n was any integer, but because the question explicitly states that n is even (part i) and n is odd (part ii) the correct answer is the one involving 2n.Could you please explain how you'd get 4n if n was any integer? I was under the impression that you can't simplify it if they didn't explicitly say that it was odd or even.
I've done a mock of solutions here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hGcrpUJ8ZDRwrNhTRcALI2slH4exFqTL/view?usp=sharing
My teacher confirmedI'm curious as to how you arrived at 4n? Do you remember what you did?
9ai: pi(4n+1)
9aii: -pi(4n+1).
Do you guys think that will be accepted? If not, will i at least get 1 mark of out 3 for the working?
Could you please explain how you'd get 4n if n was any integer? I was under the impression that you can't simplify it if they didn't explicitly say that it was odd or even.
I'm curious as to how you arrived at 4n? Do you remember what you did?
@turtlesforeveryone how is it that you're able to do the yr 12 methods exam as a year 9 student? :o are you going to do 3/4 methods next year or something?As per this thread, turtlesforeveryone is not your common or garden variety Yr 9... Are any of the Yr 9's on here for that matter?
Do people know when the examiners report will be released? Very curious to see the percentage who answered the last few questions correctly
Last year's exam reports were released around March/April so I'd expect the same for this year :)sweet, thanks ;D