So is a 'sequence of partial sums' a 'sequence within a sequence' or a 'sequence of a sequence'?
Neither: If you are given some sequence of numbers

then we can define the nth partial sum to be

i.e the sum of the first

terms. The we can consider a new sequence

of numbers.
Now what you are always interested in is whether

has a limit i.e if the partial sums have a limit. If so then we say that the series

converges.
Could anyone put up a simple geometric series, and show how one goes about finding if it is convergent/divergent?
For geometric series there is a simple way of determining whether it converges or not.

converges when

and it does not converge otherwise. Let's prove this straight from the definition I gave above:
So we first have to find the nth partial sum.

Where I used a well known formula you may be familiar with from sometime in your education.
Now let's check whether the the sequence

does converge. Let's firstly consider the case

. You know that

if

hence

. Hence this is the limit of the

's and so by definition the series

converges to the value

.
If on the other hand in the case

can you see why the

does not converge to any number?
I'm guessing this is what the integral test/root test/comparision test/ratio test/"enter lots of tests here" are for.
As my post is long enough as it is, I won't go into more details, what I've written so far seems to be enough to think about for the moment. You can check TT's Maths Thread, I remember he went through heaps of these ages ago ( forum search ratio test, root test etc. since it is a large thread so it may be hard to find where exactly)