So is a 'sequence of partial sums' a 'sequence within a sequence' or a 'sequence of a sequence'?
Neither: If you are given some sequence of numbers 

 then we can define the nth partial sum to be 

 i.e the sum of the first 

 terms. The we can consider a new sequence 

 of numbers.
Now what you are always interested in is whether 

 has a limit i.e if the partial sums have a limit. If so then we say that the series 

 converges. 
Could anyone put up a simple geometric series, and show how one goes about finding if it is convergent/divergent?
For geometric series there is a simple way of determining whether it converges or not. 

 converges when 

 and it does not converge otherwise. Let's prove this straight from the definition I gave above:
So we first have to find the nth partial sum.

Where I used a well known formula you may be familiar with from sometime in your education.
Now let's check whether the the sequence 

 does converge. Let's firstly consider the case 

. You know that 

 if 

 hence 

. Hence this is the limit of the 

's and so by definition the series 

 converges to the value 

.
If on the other hand in the case 

 can you see why the 

 does not converge to any number?
I'm guessing this is what the integral test/root test/comparision test/ratio test/"enter lots of tests here" are for.
As my post is long enough as it is, I won't go into more details, what I've written so far seems to be enough to think about for the moment. You can check TT's Maths Thread, I remember he went through heaps of these ages ago ( forum search ratio test, root test etc. since it is a large thread so it may be hard to find where exactly)