Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 28, 2025, 12:44:11 am

Author Topic: Is VCE fair?  (Read 33395 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

AzureBlue

  • Guest
Re: Is VCE fair?
« Reply #165 on: October 24, 2010, 07:00:02 pm »
0
Also at the risk of sounding like an idiot again: what's tok?? i gather it's soemthing to do with extra curriculars and is a component of IB?
TOK is Theory of Knowledge. CAS is community, action, service (with extra-curriculars) I believe.

tram

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1341
  • Respect: +22
Re: Is VCE fair?
« Reply #166 on: October 24, 2010, 07:12:03 pm »
0
and theory of knowledge is.............

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: Is VCE fair?
« Reply #167 on: October 24, 2010, 07:38:29 pm »
0
and theory of knowledge is.............

What it sounds like. A mixture of philosophy and research (although nothing like the EE). They have to write an essay on a prompt discussing something like how "knowledge" should be developed etc.

Wish I'd done IB, the syllabus is very impressive.

Thought on altering VCE, get rid of the bell curve scaling, get rid of ATAR scores. Kids pick subjects over two years (1/2 and 3/4) and then their academic record gets reported to whatever university they apply for. So even if you do a LOTE and specialist and get low absolute marks, the university can still consider that whilst assessing your application
« Last Edit: October 24, 2010, 07:44:46 pm by Russ »

EvangelionZeta

  • Quintessence of Dust
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2435
  • Respect: +288
Re: Is VCE fair?
« Reply #168 on: October 24, 2010, 07:39:51 pm »
0
and theory of knowledge is.............

Really really bad epistemology - "How do we know xyxy is true?" or something, apparently.
---

Finished VCE in 2010 and now teaching professionally. For any inquiries, email me at [email protected].

tram

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1341
  • Respect: +22
Re: Is VCE fair?
« Reply #169 on: October 24, 2010, 08:09:28 pm »
0
and theory of knowledge is.............

What it sounds like. A mixture of philosophy and research (although nothing like the EE). They have to write an essay on a prompt discussing something like how "knowledge" should be developed etc.

Wish I'd done IB, the syllabus is very impressive.

Thought on altering VCE, get rid of the bell curve scaling, get rid of ATAR scores. Kids pick subjects over two years (1/2 and 3/4) and then their academic record gets reported to whatever university they apply for. So even if you do a LOTE and specialist and get low absolute marks, the university can still consider that whilst assessing your application

hmmmmmm i do like that idea..... but it's just too hard for every uni to indivudually assess each student's record, a atar make it so muhc easier to compare applicants..... also awarding scolarships would be an abosulute bitch? how do you qunatitatively compare a insane mark in a subject that is easy to a slightly worse mark in a insanely hard subject?

and theory of knowledge is.............

Really really bad epistemology - "How do we know xyxy is true?" or something, apparently.

epistemology is...........

slothpomba

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4458
  • Chief Executive Sloth
  • Respect: +327
Re: Is VCE fair?
« Reply #170 on: October 24, 2010, 08:11:36 pm »
0
Philosophy of knowledge... in 3 words

Here are more words

ATAR Notes Chat
Philosophy thread
-----
2011-15: Bachelor of Science/Arts (Religious studies) @ Monash Clayton - Majors: Pharmacology, Physiology, Developmental Biology
2016: Bachelor of Science (Honours) - Psychiatry research

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: Is VCE fair?
« Reply #171 on: October 24, 2010, 08:56:05 pm »
0
and theory of knowledge is.............

What it sounds like. A mixture of philosophy and research (although nothing like the EE). They have to write an essay on a prompt discussing something like how "knowledge" should be developed etc.

Wish I'd done IB, the syllabus is very impressive.

Thought on altering VCE, get rid of the bell curve scaling, get rid of ATAR scores. Kids pick subjects over two years (1/2 and 3/4) and then their academic record gets reported to whatever university they apply for. So even if you do a LOTE and specialist and get low absolute marks, the university can still consider that whilst assessing your application

You'd adding a level of subjectivity there -> One because without scaling, you can't compare subject to subject in any objective sense, and number two, now you have assessors choosing who goes into what course and assessors aren't actually good at that.
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.