Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 19, 2025, 05:41:17 pm
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Definitely a subject to avoid!  (Read 6669 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

burbs

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Fuck da police - Aristotle
  • Respect: +227
Re: Definitely a subject to avoid!
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2010, 01:03:52 am »
0
Quote from: careyboy on November 13, 2010, 06:07:59 pm
Quote from: Burberry on November 13, 2010, 03:20:17 am
Quote from: jsher098 on November 12, 2010, 07:36:45 pm
Quote from: accaz on November 12, 2010, 07:19:23 pm
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....

No you would get 2 out of 10.

Those two marks were for explaining the change issue and explaining change. If you didn't do these then you will not get 10/10.

lol burberry, wishful thinking...im just waiting for you to admit your wrong and that kotter does not get you extra marks.

mate, never said it would give extra marks. Said it could be justified to put it in, but even when I put it in I didn't assume extra marks.
Logged

careyboy

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: 0
Re: Definitely a subject to avoid!
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2010, 01:07:40 am »
0
Quote from: Burberry on November 14, 2010, 01:03:52 am
Quote from: careyboy on November 13, 2010, 06:07:59 pm
Quote from: Burberry on November 13, 2010, 03:20:17 am
Quote from: jsher098 on November 12, 2010, 07:36:45 pm
Quote from: accaz on November 12, 2010, 07:19:23 pm
u guys have to be kidding if u spoke about kotters for the whole thing.. u would get max 2/10... it doesnt relate to the question
Umm you wouldnt get 2 out of 10 you would get 0 out of 10. I believe the VCAA made this question to piss all the people off who memorised responses to Kotter's theory....

No you would get 2 out of 10.

Those two marks were for explaining the change issue and explaining change. If you didn't do these then you will not get 10/10.

lol burberry, wishful thinking...im just waiting for you to admit your wrong and that kotter does not get you extra marks.

mate, never said it would give extra marks. Said it could be justified to put it in, but even when I put it in I didn't assume extra marks.

ok but from your posts earliar it seemed u believed kotter had to be included to get full marks in which it didnt, but i agree with the post u just posted
Logged

burbs

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1800
  • Fuck da police - Aristotle
  • Respect: +227
Re: Definitely a subject to avoid!
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2010, 01:10:21 am »
0
nah, I wrote only if you had finished and had extra time, may as well have. Let's just leave it.
Logged

careyboy

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: 0
Re: Definitely a subject to avoid!
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2010, 01:13:42 am »
0
Quote from: Burberry on November 14, 2010, 01:10:21 am
nah, I wrote only if you had finished and had extra time, may as well have. Let's just leave it.
well im glad we finally agree, i think this question will mess alot of people up because people would have wrote about kotter to fill up the lines. i also finished early but instead of adding kotter onto my back page i went back and read over my work making sure it made sense and no spelling mistakes
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up