Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 07, 2025, 05:53:18 am

Author Topic: dejan91's questions  (Read 16940 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Over9000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
  • Loves the banter
  • Respect: +20
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #30 on: April 11, 2009, 12:11:45 am »
0
First reaarange so that x and y are seperated



divide both sides by 3 to have coefficient as 1

Complete the square



and

Now:
......1
...............2
However lets be sneaky and sub in y=x+1 and as we have worked them out





and

therefore y=1 and
So points of intersection are (0,1) and

you can check, by subbing y=x+1 into equation 2 if u want
« Last Edit: April 11, 2009, 12:17:48 am by Over9000 »
Gundam 00 is SOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH GOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDD I cleaned my room

VCE 200n(where n is an element of y): Banter 3/4, Swagger 3/4, Fresh 3/4, Fly 3/4

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #31 on: April 11, 2009, 12:14:39 am »
0
^^^^^^^^ SO F***KING PRO, I was stuck on this Q for like ages. pro pro legendary man.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #32 on: April 11, 2009, 01:49:44 am »
0
Thanks heaps Over9000 :)


Might I add, explanation was A++
« Last Edit: April 11, 2009, 01:57:08 am by dejan91 »
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

Over9000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1468
  • Loves the banter
  • Respect: +20
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #33 on: April 11, 2009, 01:54:58 am »
0
Thanks heaps Over900 :)


Might I add, explanation was A++
No probs, glad to help  ;)
Gundam 00 is SOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH GOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDD I cleaned my room

VCE 200n(where n is an element of y): Banter 3/4, Swagger 3/4, Fresh 3/4, Fly 3/4

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #34 on: April 11, 2009, 11:00:15 am »
0
That was using the cross product as the cross product of two vectors is perpendicular to the two vectors. However it's not in the specialist course so unfortunately you can't use it in the exam. :P

Incorrect.  Any maths assessor worth their weight in salt will know and understand the cross product (god, even the physics assessors would).

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #35 on: April 11, 2009, 06:22:26 pm »
0
That was using the cross product as the cross product of two vectors is perpendicular to the two vectors. However it's not in the specialist course so unfortunately you can't use it in the exam. :P

Incorrect.  Any maths assessor worth their weight in salt will know and understand the cross product (god, even the physics assessors would).

I should add that, unless specified by the question, any method that is logically coherent and rigorous will be marked as correct. (But they design the questions with this in mind, so that CAS kids and UMEP/MUEP kids aren't at an advantage)

However, personally I would stay on the safe side and stay within the syllabus.
« Last Edit: April 11, 2009, 06:24:00 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

dekoyl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2152
  • Respect: +18
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #36 on: April 11, 2009, 08:15:10 pm »
0
That was using the cross product as the cross product of two vectors is perpendicular to the two vectors. However it's not in the specialist course so unfortunately you can't use it in the exam. :P

Incorrect.  Any maths assessor worth their weight in salt will know and understand the cross product (god, even the physics assessors would).
Cool. I didn't know that. I made a big assumption then as I asked my teacher if the cross product could be used and he said no.
I stand corrected.

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #37 on: April 11, 2009, 08:19:48 pm »
0
Cool. I didn't know that. I made a big assumption then as I asked my teacher if the cross product could be used and he said no.
I stand corrected.

If your teacher says that the cross product doesn't exist, then you shouldn't use it when you are doing maths for your teacher.  (Its a parallel of price discrimination.  Maths discrimination: doing maths based on who will be reading it)

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #38 on: April 11, 2009, 08:25:43 pm »
0
When using maths that isn't on the syllabus, you won't get working marks if you get the answer wrong, or so i've been told.
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #39 on: April 13, 2009, 09:39:16 pm »
0
EDIT: Sorry, accidently clicked post before i finished.
Question was:  Solve for x where :


            





Let


and

I used this but only got one solution out of a possibl four. What did I do wrong? Or haven't I gone far enough?
« Last Edit: April 13, 2009, 09:52:16 pm by dejan91 »
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #40 on: April 13, 2009, 09:45:03 pm »
0






Null factor law or

Can you do it from here?
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #41 on: April 13, 2009, 09:51:42 pm »
0
Cool thanks TrueTears, do you know if my way was wrong?
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #42 on: April 13, 2009, 09:53:44 pm »
0
Your mistake was that you cancelled out a possible solution when you simplified by cancelling out the cos(2x)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #43 on: April 13, 2009, 09:56:06 pm »
0
Hmm I see. Ok then thanks for pointing that out.
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: dejan91's questions
« Reply #44 on: April 13, 2009, 10:00:27 pm »
0
Say you have sinxcosx = cosx

if you cancel cosx from both sides, you are in fact losing a solution

this is the same thing as saying



you wouldn't cancel a x on both sides, because it will lose a solution, so that's why you move to the LHS and do null factor.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.