Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 06:28:31 am

Author Topic: .  (Read 57945 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

crayolé

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 788
  • Respect: +3
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #180 on: July 28, 2010, 09:38:29 pm »
0
99% sure it was LEAST needed

I chose politeness

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #181 on: July 28, 2010, 09:39:24 pm »
0
yeah, it was definitely LEAST...
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
  • Respect: +65
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #182 on: July 28, 2010, 09:40:38 pm »
0
OMG was it LEAST needed??????????????????

Well quite a few are saying what she did have. SO I'm kinda confused. I thought I read it properly. But I could have misread it.

It definitely said least required on my test.

Did everyone say she was sadistic?
I said she was cause she only got really angry at them when a customer was watching - getting pleasure from humiliating them.

YAY! Does anyone get the tidiness factor? Cos it was mentioned so many times I would have thought it would definitely not be needed by her. Have yet to hear one person choose that :S :S

And yes I think I put something else originally then changed it to sadistic a few minutes later.
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #183 on: July 28, 2010, 09:41:10 pm »
0
cmon guys isnt sadistic a little extreme...good ol'Ed warned us about extremes..

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #184 on: July 28, 2010, 09:43:03 pm »
0
I get where you guys are coming from.  Ambiguity in the question.

Least needs because she doesn't value the quality, or least needs because it already occurs.

Of course, they won't change budge because that would screw up there top secret marking scheme.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #185 on: July 28, 2010, 09:44:06 pm »
0
cmon guys isnt sadistic a little extreme...good ol'Ed warned us about extremes..

I don't think it was too extreme. She was an extreme lady.

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
  • Respect: +65
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #186 on: July 28, 2010, 09:44:28 pm »
0
How could politeness be the least needed? Obviously she was rude and it was like the only one that referred to manners so wouldn't she have DEFINITELY needed that? So you had to choose which option she most clearly didn't need.

Just looking for an explanation, there must be some big reason why heaps of people chose it.
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


darkheavens

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #187 on: July 28, 2010, 09:45:05 pm »
0
does anyone remember the answers to the questions to do with the dad and his son talking about how his wife hasn't been coming home lately?

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #188 on: July 28, 2010, 09:45:26 pm »
0
Yeah, because she was impolite, she wouldn't expect it in return or need it...
« Last Edit: July 28, 2010, 09:48:31 pm by stonecold »
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

Slumdawg

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
  • Respect: +65
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #189 on: July 28, 2010, 09:45:42 pm »
0
I get where you guys are coming from.  Ambiguity in the question.

Least needs because she doesn't value the quality, or least needs because it already occurs.

Of course, they won't change budge because that would screw up there top secret marking scheme.

OHHHHHH. I get it now. Thanks for clearing it up! Just up to luck now I guess.
2010 ATAR: 98.35 - Psychology [50] Media Studies [47
2011-'13: Bachelor of Biomedicine [Neuroscience Major] at Melbourne Uni 
2014-'17: Doctor of Medicine (MD) at Melbourne Uni 


fady_22

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Respect: +5
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #190 on: July 28, 2010, 09:46:35 pm »
0
I couldn't answer that set of questions properly; I was laughing at the name "McCurry's" the whole time. :)
2009: Biology [46]
2010: Literature [44], Chemistry [50], Physics [46], Mathematical Methods CAS [46], Specialist Mathematics [42]

ATAR: 99.70

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #191 on: July 28, 2010, 09:47:49 pm »
0
for the dad and son question i put
-innocent
-is affecting both his marriage and relationship with dad < probably wrong (was running out of time.  it was because his wife was cheating or not spending time at home...

i had to rush and stuffed everything. :(
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #192 on: July 28, 2010, 09:48:45 pm »
0
How could politeness be the least needed? Obviously she was rude and it was like the only one that referred to manners so wouldn't she have DEFINITELY needed that? So you had to choose which option she most clearly didn't need.

Just looking for an explanation, there must be some big reason why heaps of people chose it.
well you need 50%+1 of the cohort to choose it for it too be right, i would say the majority would have chosen politeness, remember many people aren't going to stop and look for greater reasoning because of time constraints, the way i see it majority immediately recognizes lady as a biatch and puts down politeness as least need then bails onto other questions lol    

mikee65

  • Guest
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #193 on: July 28, 2010, 09:50:18 pm »
0
for the dad and son question i put
-innocent
-is affecting both his marriage and relationship with dad < probably wrong (was running out of time.  it was because his wife was cheating or not spending time at home...

i had to rush and stuffed everything. :(

i put impolite also but many others chose other options oh well

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: UMAT Morning Session
« Reply #194 on: July 28, 2010, 09:50:54 pm »
0
How could politeness be the least needed? Obviously she was rude and it was like the only one that referred to manners so wouldn't she have DEFINITELY needed that? So you had to choose which option she most clearly didn't need.

Just looking for an explanation, there must be some big reason why heaps of people chose it.
well you need 50%+1 of the cohort to choose it for it too be right, i would say the majority would have chosen politeness, remember many people aren't going to stop and look for greater reasoning because of time constraints, the way i see it majority immediately recognizes lady as a biatch and puts down politeness as least need then bails onto other questions lol    

The questions are tested beforehand.  The answers are predetermined.

Either when the question was previously tested in a random sample of all ages, a majority was found, which became the answer in the UMAT, or there was a split between two answers, and an 'expert' got to choose the answer.
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown