you can say whatever you want about political matters, that is constitutionally protected. but freedom of speech in the same sense as the USA, South Africa and other countries is not constitutionally protected. (note, creating a strawman argument was not my intention)
but I do support your points chavi, particularly because the other side is still failing to counteract your arguments, and if anything their aim seems to be to oppress your viewpoint and nothing more. To the other side: note that Chavi is not picking on the religion he is picking on the supposed (which more than justifies Chavi's right to argue) HAI link to supporting terrorism.
whether or not Chavi's religion was giving out free laptop's in which case he wouldn't complain is irrelevant unless Chavi has a religion that supports terrorists.