Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 17, 2025, 08:53:16 am

Author Topic: Tau = 2pi  (Read 1896 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326

WhoTookMyUsername

  • Guest
Re: Tau = 2pi
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2011, 07:06:59 pm »
0
this debate has been going on for ages. Maybe more mathematically pretty but i don't think most people really care and it will change so many computations and coursework for all ages.

The general consensus will be CBF just like conventional current and other anomalies before it.

taiga

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4085
  • Respect: +588
Re: Tau = 2pi
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2011, 07:14:41 pm »
0
an easy way to impress the mathematically uneducated :D

Still pretty cool, but won't help efficiency that much
vce: english, methods, spesh, chemistry, physics, geography.

ex admin/mod/partner

2010: Melbourne High School (VCE)
2011 - 2016: Monash University BComm/BEng (Hons)


If you guys have any concerns/suggestions for making ATARNotes a better place, don't hesitate to PM me.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Tau = 2pi
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2011, 07:16:11 pm »
+1
LOL pi isn't wrong, it is right, this is a matter of definitions, all you're doing is defining tau = 2pi, what's so hard about writing an extra '2' -_-
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Tau = 2pi
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2011, 07:16:54 pm »
+3
NOOO. I don't have enough Greek letters as is. Don't take away more symbols for these constants. :(

(let's face it, two alphabets simply isn't enough, especially when half of the Greek alphabet is already taken up by constants and special operators.)
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326
Re: Tau = 2pi
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2011, 07:22:35 pm »
0
LOL pi isn't wrong, it is right, this is a matter of definitions, all you're doing is defining tau = 2pi, what's so hard about writing an extra '2'
-_-
That's what I was thinking. Though I guess it does line up stuff like 1/4th of a circle to be tau/4 instead of pi/2.
That really isn't a big deal though. Other than that I didn't see much of an advantage in switching stuff around.

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Tau = 2pi
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2011, 08:46:33 pm »
+2
I think I read this in the mX (of all places). It's just a case of the nooby tauists trying to outdo us pi-ists.

Anyways, 'Rohittau' has a double 't', so 'pi' it is ;)