My teacher has told of three ways in which to write analyse a piece of writing.
They are:
- In order or appearance e.g. beginning, middle and end.
Cheers.
your teacher is actually wrong here, i dont know why they'd tell you that.
There's not really that many 'wrongs' in English and that definitely isn't one of them. I know students with 50s and such who say they just use a conventional chronological method and it works for them. The problems you pointed out only result from poor planning in using a chronological method. However, while I do still see it as a less effective method than grouping techniques together, it's not exactly a 'do this and you're screwed' sort of thing. I wouldn't want people reading this and thinking they have to relearn how to write a language analysis a few weeks before the exam.
Hmm fair enough, although i just wanted to point out that this isnt something that you have to strictly stick to - the order in which you do it shouldnt be based on start to finish.
As you said there aren't many 'wrongs' in english, however it is my belief that to go in chronological order, given the nature of the piece may sometimes lead to an ineffective language analysis, despite the potential of the writer. In no means did i mean 'you'd be screwed' but in effect, you could leave out the name of the author and you would still not be screwed - it's only one thing, but nonetheless, important.
I realise many people adopt this approach and after gauging at the assessment reports i came to the conclusion that VCAA like to target students on these sort of things - for example, you'll note that they make a
heavy emphasis on the inability of students to identify tonal shifts. - so im certainly going to be looking out for that on the exam.
i think they may end up putting crucial techniques and shifts in tone right at the end, resulting in a a large proportion of people who follow a chronological method of analysis will miss / forget to discuss this major aspect.
The point im trying to get across is that there shouldn't be a set order in which you analyse your article - because every article is completely different and set out that way on purpose - rather analyse it how you see fit.
I apologise if i have created concern for people going from start to finish, you by no means have to re-learn your method of writing LA's, it's just my own suggestion that if you find this method is too hard to stick to, or if you seldom analyse the end bits because you run out of time - mix up your order of analysis, and you'll be fine
