Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 19, 2025, 10:40:54 am

Author Topic: last minute question  (Read 3393 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zebra

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
  • Get to work!
  • Respect: +8
last minute question
« on: November 09, 2011, 09:47:24 pm »
0
2007 question 5.

WHY DO YOU USE CONSTANT ACC FORMULA?????????????????????????????????????????????????//

WHERE DOES IT TELL YOU THE ACC IS CONSTANT??????????????????????????????????????????????????


why can't you just use initial v, final v, time to work out acc?
2010:
Mathematical Methods CAS 3/4 [41->45.8]

2011:
English Second Language 3/4 [46->47.1], Chemistry 3/4 [42->45.6], Specialist Maths 3/4 [38->49.2], LOTE [33->40.9], Biology 3/4 [41->42]

aggregate: 195.9
2011 ATAR: 99.25

2012-2015: Bachelor of Pharmacy (Honours)

Zebra

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
  • Get to work!
  • Respect: +8
Re: last minute question
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2011, 10:05:05 pm »
0
my fucking goodness....

no sleep tonight!
2010:
Mathematical Methods CAS 3/4 [41->45.8]

2011:
English Second Language 3/4 [46->47.1], Chemistry 3/4 [42->45.6], Specialist Maths 3/4 [38->49.2], LOTE [33->40.9], Biology 3/4 [41->42]

aggregate: 195.9
2011 ATAR: 99.25

2012-2015: Bachelor of Pharmacy (Honours)

dc302

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1031
  • Respect: +53
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Re: last minute question
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2011, 10:10:12 pm »
0
Are you talking about exam 1? The acceleration is definitely constant, because there are no forces acting on it except friction (and friction is a constant force here).


edit: and yes you can, and you ARE using the initial/final v and time.

edit2: what I meant by my first edit is:

the constant accel formula is this:   v=u+at. That is precisely using the initial and final velocities and time taken ie, a = (v-u)/t
« Last Edit: November 09, 2011, 10:13:16 pm by dc302 »
2012-2015 - Doctor of Medicine (MD) @ UniMelb
2010-2011 - Bachelor of Science (BSc) majoring in Pure Mathematics @ UniMelb
2009 - VCE [99.70] -- Eng [43] - Methods [44] - Chem [44] - JapSL [45] - Spesh [45] - MUEP Jap [5.5]

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: last minute question
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2011, 10:22:47 pm »
+1
Ha just did this exam. :)

Constant forces = constant acceleration.

You are not given t so you have to use v^2 = u^2 + 2as where s = 3, u = 4 and v = 0.

dc302

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1031
  • Respect: +53
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Re: last minute question
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2011, 10:25:48 pm »
0
Ha just did this exam. :)

Constant forces = constant acceleration.

You are not given t so you have to use v^2 = u^2 + 2as where s = 3, u = 4 and v = 0.

Oops, my mistake. Read 3 seconds instead of 3m hah :D
2012-2015 - Doctor of Medicine (MD) @ UniMelb
2010-2011 - Bachelor of Science (BSc) majoring in Pure Mathematics @ UniMelb
2009 - VCE [99.70] -- Eng [43] - Methods [44] - Chem [44] - JapSL [45] - Spesh [45] - MUEP Jap [5.5]

Zebra

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
  • Get to work!
  • Respect: +8
Re: last minute question
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2011, 10:49:22 pm »
0
Ha just did this exam. :)

Constant forces = constant acceleration.

You are not given t so you have to use v^2 = u^2 + 2as where s = 3, u = 4 and v = 0.

Oops, my mistake. Read 3 seconds instead of 3m hah :D
same.

okay. i thought this shit was new guys. thanks! and good luck...

if you guys are not asleep, 2006 question 4)a) (exam 1) ?

i used lami's and got it wrong!
2010:
Mathematical Methods CAS 3/4 [41->45.8]

2011:
English Second Language 3/4 [46->47.1], Chemistry 3/4 [42->45.6], Specialist Maths 3/4 [38->49.2], LOTE [33->40.9], Biology 3/4 [41->42]

aggregate: 195.9
2011 ATAR: 99.25

2012-2015: Bachelor of Pharmacy (Honours)

Zebra

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
  • Get to work!
  • Respect: +8
Re: last minute question
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2011, 10:55:07 pm »
0
got it. thanks to itute... !
2010:
Mathematical Methods CAS 3/4 [41->45.8]

2011:
English Second Language 3/4 [46->47.1], Chemistry 3/4 [42->45.6], Specialist Maths 3/4 [38->49.2], LOTE [33->40.9], Biology 3/4 [41->42]

aggregate: 195.9
2011 ATAR: 99.25

2012-2015: Bachelor of Pharmacy (Honours)

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Re: last minute question
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2011, 10:58:14 pm »
0
When you prove a rectangle, do you have to prove ALL angles are right angles?
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

AleksIlia

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 73
  • Respect: 0
Re: last minute question
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2011, 11:00:33 pm »
0
When you prove a rectangle, do you have to prove ALL angles are right angles?

No just one pair of sides afaik.

ellecee

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Respect: +4
Re: last minute question
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2011, 11:01:16 pm »
0
You can also prove that the diagonals are of equal length

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Re: last minute question
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2011, 11:02:01 pm »
0
So say for ABCD, would you be able to attain full marks if you just proved angle(ABC) and angle(BAC) are right angles?
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Re: last minute question
« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2011, 11:03:53 pm »
0
You can also prove that the diagonals are of equal length

How would you differentiate a square from a rectangle then, if you just prove that the diagonals are equal in magnitude? (I'm thinking that this is a stupid Q which I know the answer to :P)
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

davidle_10

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 196
  • Respect: +1
Re: last minute question
« Reply #12 on: November 09, 2011, 11:13:20 pm »
0
You can also prove that the diagonals are of equal length

How would you differentiate a square from a rectangle then, if you just prove that the diagonals are equal in magnitude? (I'm thinking that this is a stupid Q which I know the answer to :P)
Lol, to differentiate a square from a rectangle the magnitude of all lengths of the square are the same.
2010: Methods
2011:English, Chemistry,Physics, Specialist, Further.

ellecee

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Respect: +4
Re: last minute question
« Reply #13 on: November 09, 2011, 11:13:34 pm »
0
You can also prove that the diagonals are of equal length

How would you differentiate a square from a rectangle then, if you just prove that the diagonals are equal in magnitude? (I'm thinking that this is a stupid Q which I know the answer to :P)

You don't. Squares are merely a special rectangle. :)

Zebra

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 541
  • Get to work!
  • Respect: +8
Re: last minute question
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2011, 11:29:42 pm »
0
if asked to prove something is a kite how would you guys do it?
2010:
Mathematical Methods CAS 3/4 [41->45.8]

2011:
English Second Language 3/4 [46->47.1], Chemistry 3/4 [42->45.6], Specialist Maths 3/4 [38->49.2], LOTE [33->40.9], Biology 3/4 [41->42]

aggregate: 195.9
2011 ATAR: 99.25

2012-2015: Bachelor of Pharmacy (Honours)