Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 18, 2026, 02:27:54 am

Author Topic: Motivational theories  (Read 2039 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mandos

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Respect: 0
Motivational theories
« on: November 17, 2011, 12:32:39 pm »
0
Still not confident in structuring compare and contrast questions involving management theories... eg. Maslow vs. Herzberg. Is it best to start with a definition of each? Any tips?

smithy16

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 122
  • Respect: +5
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2011, 12:34:54 pm »
0
I'm in the same boat as you. Except i'm having trouble with discussing how they can be used to motivate employees.

RobDog

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 190
  • Respect: -1
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2011, 12:36:32 pm »
0
Definitions are always good i reckon.
Just think of the obvious stuff.
Compare = Maslow's lower order needs such as Physiological and Safety are identical to what Herzberg classes as his 'Hygiene factors'.
Contrast = Maslow suggests that these lower orders needs which Herzberg classes as hygiene factors do in fact motivate employees, whereas Herzberg believes that they do not motivate, but rather ensure dissatisfaction does not occur.


RobDog

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 190
  • Respect: -1
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2011, 12:40:43 pm »
0
Also i got a question as well, could you say a similarity between Hertzberg and Locke's theory is that they both provide situations where the employee won't be motivated. eg: hygience factors and easily obtainable goals?
Thanks.

tashpash

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2011, 02:51:28 pm »
0
Well the point of Locke's is to develop goals that WILL be effective in motivating. If they aren't then you could say that Locke's isn't being completed effectively.

tashpash

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2011, 02:53:12 pm »
0
Could you say that they differ because Locke's involves employees more? Cause you actually have to collaborate with them to form the goals while with Herzberg's you're just meeting their needs. Or does meeting their needs also involve them in the process?

RobDog

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 190
  • Respect: -1
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2011, 03:00:18 pm »
0
Could you say that they differ because Locke's involves employees more? Cause you actually have to collaborate with them to form the goals while with Herzberg's you're just meeting their needs. Or does meeting their needs also involve them in the process?
That should be fine cause you could include that with Locke's, management is required to provide regular feedback on progress towards the goals, so that further increases employee and employer involvement.

tashpash

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2011, 03:05:48 pm »
0
Sweet! Totally just made that up in my head right now. If I can somehow do that in the exam tomorrow I should do alright :)

RobDog

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 190
  • Respect: -1
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2011, 03:11:24 pm »
0
Rofl, i wouldn't count on suddenly becoming a genius during a 2 hour exam, but that's just me.   :-\

tashpash

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2011, 03:16:10 pm »
0
Yeah... I'll always come across at least one question where I actually won't know what to do and I'll just sit there like "oh shit."

meghannn

  • New South Welsh
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Respect: 0
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2011, 03:53:24 pm »
0
what are the similarities, i have looked all over here and no real answer. as in similarities between maslow vs locke and herzberg vs locke???

tashpash

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2011, 04:01:25 pm »
0
They are both effective in motivating staff and see the importance in intrinsic motivators (Locke's goals similar to Herzberg's motivator factors and Maslow's higher-order needs (social, esteem, self actualisation))

That's all I have :S

rambo9593

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Respect: 0
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2011, 06:48:20 pm »
0
for a compare and contrast for motivational theories i dont define it i give a brief intro and then explain the theory in my similarities and difference really save time rather than writing a page on the theory and how it works. 

Niskii

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 105
  • Respect: +1
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Motivational theories
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2011, 06:55:31 pm »
0
what are the similarities, i have looked all over here and no real answer. as in similarities between maslow vs locke and herzberg vs locke???

Perhaps you could say all theories state that motivation can be gained through achievement/recognition? Locke - achievement of goals/recognition if management recognises completion of goals promptly after completion, Maslow - Esteem, Hertzberg - Achievement/esteem boost as a motivational factor.
2011: Mathematical Methods (CAS), Business Management
2012: English Language, Chemistry, Specialist Mathematics, French
ATAR: 99.80
2013: Commerce/Law @ Monash Clayton