Why is it that when there is a translation of 3 units to the left when you are applying translations to sketch graphs and it's mapped like (x,y) -> (x-1, y) Why is the equation y=(x+1)^2 ? As in plus NOT minus?? I mean it's not hugely important but I was just kinda curious.
Suppose we a graph of a function \(y=f(x)\) and some point \((x,\,y)\).
Let's say we apply a translation of \(3\) units in the positive \(x\)-direction (to the right). That is, \((x',\,y')=(x+3,\,y)\). This makes intuitive sense. We want to move a point \((x,\,y)\) \(3\) units to the right, and so we add \(3\) to the \(x\)-coordinate.
But why does this transformation map the graph of \(y=f(x)\) onto the graph of \(y=f(x-3)?\) Miniturtle mentioned a way to help you
remember that transformations involving changing \(x\) isn't 'intuitive', but it doesn't carry any mathematical reasoning.
Firstly, we have \[\begin{cases}x'=x+3\\ y'=y\end{cases}\implies \begin{cases}x=x'-3\\y=y'\end{cases}\quad\text{(rearrange both equations for }x\ \text{and }y)\] and so we can write \(y=f(x)\) with our expressions for \(x\) and \(y\) in terms of \(x'\) and \(y'\). That is, \[y=f(x)\implies y'=f(x'-3)\] and so if we drop the dashes, we have \[y=f(x)\ \overset{\text{3 units right}}{\longrightarrow}\ y=f(x-3)\]
To summarise (and generalise), a translation of \(h\) units in the positive \(x\)-direction has the following affects:\[(x,\,y)\longrightarrow(x+h,\,y)\quad\text{and}\quad y=f(x)\longrightarrow y=f(x-h)\]