Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 30, 2025, 08:20:05 pm

Author Topic: VCE Methods Question Thread!  (Read 5705607 times)  Share 

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

soNasty

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3990 on: February 14, 2014, 06:41:39 pm »
0
yeah, that's what i keep getting.
the back of the book says it's:


ealam2

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 440
  • Respect: +15
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3991 on: February 14, 2014, 06:47:52 pm »
0
Hehe, fair enough. On another note: has anyone found the textbook helpful during an exam (if they brought it in for reference)?

I think it's generally better if you make your own bound reference as it serves for your own revision and you actually know what's in it and can paste in cut-outs and practice SACs if you want with extra examples.

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3992 on: February 14, 2014, 07:23:14 pm »
0



Now, the first derivative is just 2x. As for the derivative of , a chain rule application yields

Putting this altogether, you should get

As mentioned above.

So that was my working above. Now, moving on from the final result by putting over a common denominator (notice how the square root disappears):

2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Anchy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Respect: +5
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3993 on: February 14, 2014, 07:46:35 pm »
0
Hi can I pls have some help with this:

Transform 1/x

- Translate 6 units right
- Translate 1 unit up
- Reflection in yaxis
- Dilation factor of 2 from x axis
( in that order)

The textbook answer is -2/(x+6) + 2 and I can't get the correct answer. Thank you :)
Bachelor of Arts/Laws @ Monash University

abcdqd

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +61
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3994 on: February 14, 2014, 08:02:13 pm »
+2
Hi can I pls have some help with this:

Transform 1/x

- Translate 6 units right
- Translate 1 unit up
- Reflection in yaxis
- Dilation factor of 2 from x axis
( in that order)

The textbook answer is -2/(x+6) + 2 and I can't get the correct answer. Thank you :)
Let's do this step by step:

- Translate 6 units right  becomes
- Translate 1 unit up becomes

Reflections in the y-axis are done by changing to . Note that you only change the term, i.e. becomes
- Reflection in y-axis becomes

Dilations in the x-axis are done by multiplying the entire function by the dilation factor.

- Dilation factor of 2 from x axis becomes

When you expand this and take out a factor of -1 from your denominator it is equal to the answer provided in the book.
2012-2013: VCE, Melbourne High School

2014-2016: Bachelor of Commerce, Actuarial Studies, University of Melbourne

soNasty

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3995 on: February 14, 2014, 08:13:47 pm »
0
So that was my working above. Now, moving on from the final result by putting over a common denominator (notice how the square root disappears):



could you please show me in a bit more detail how you reached that final result? its confusing me, the whole denominator thing

IndefatigableLover

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
  • What kind of shoes do ninjas wear? Sneakers.
  • Respect: +105
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3996 on: February 14, 2014, 08:23:42 pm »
0
could you please show me in a bit more detail how you reached that final result? its confusing me, the whole denominator thing

Alright so is the same as . When we want to add fractions together we need to make the denominator the same for both (so in this case we will multiply the denominator of with . And whatever we do with the bottom we have to do to the top. Funnily when we multiply with , the square roots cancel out.

In the end when you multiply the numerator and the denominator with you'll end up with and then you add the to it to give you . :)

Professor Polonsky

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1169
  • Respect: +118
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3997 on: February 14, 2014, 08:25:58 pm »
+1
could you please show me in a bit more detail how you reached that final result? its confusing me, the whole denominator thing
The main step there was to multiply both the numerator and the denominator of the first fraction by . You then have a common denominator.







« Last Edit: February 14, 2014, 08:27:39 pm by Polonomial »

Anchy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Respect: +5
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3998 on: February 14, 2014, 08:37:36 pm »
0
Let's do this step by step:

- Translate 6 units right  becomes
- Translate 1 unit up becomes

Reflections in the y-axis are done by changing to . Note that you only change the term, i.e. becomes
- Reflection in y-axis becomes

Dilations in the x-axis are done by multiplying the entire function by the dilation factor.

- Dilation factor of 2 from x axis becomes

When you expand this and take out a factor of -1 from your denominator it is equal to the answer provided in the book.

Thank you so much for that!

I also have another question. How would you dilate 1/(x+1) -2 by a factor of 1/3?
Bachelor of Arts/Laws @ Monash University

soNasty

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 531
  • Respect: +11
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #3999 on: February 14, 2014, 08:42:56 pm »
0
Amazing thank you both :)

RKTR

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 613
  • Respect: +17
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #4000 on: February 14, 2014, 08:55:00 pm »
0
Thank you so much for that!

I also have another question. How would you dilate 1/(x+1) -2 by a factor of 1/3?
From which axis?
2015-2017: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Neuroscience)
2018: Doctor of Medicine (Withdrawn)
2019: Bachelor of Commerce (Actuarial Studies?)

Anchy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 366
  • Respect: +5
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #4001 on: February 14, 2014, 08:56:34 pm »
0
From which axis?
 
Oh sorry, from y-axis
Bachelor of Arts/Laws @ Monash University

RKTR

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 613
  • Respect: +17
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #4002 on: February 14, 2014, 09:23:20 pm »
+2
1/(3x+1)  -2?
2015-2017: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Neuroscience)
2018: Doctor of Medicine (Withdrawn)
2019: Bachelor of Commerce (Actuarial Studies?)

alchemy

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1222
  • Respect: +25
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #4003 on: February 14, 2014, 09:26:01 pm »
+2
Thank you so much for that!

I also have another question. How would you dilate 1/(x+1) -2 by a factor of 1/3 from the y-axis?

Using the dash method:

y=1/(x+1) - 2
(x',y')->(1/3x,y)
x'=x/3
x=3x', y=y'
y=1/(3x'+1) - 2
Hence, the dilated graph has the equation of 1/(3x+1) - 2


IndefatigableLover

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
  • What kind of shoes do ninjas wear? Sneakers.
  • Respect: +105
Re: VCE Methods Question Thread!
« Reply #4004 on: February 14, 2014, 09:26:44 pm »
+2
Thank you so much for that!

I also have another question. How would you dilate 1/(x+1) -2 by a factor of 1/3?
 
Oh sorry, from y-axis
So when you're dilating from the y-axis, it'll be: to
In this case, 'k' is 3 so you just put a '3' in front of every 'x' you see in the equation :)

So you're final equation should be:



EDIT: Beaten by RKTR & alchemy (but it's good to see the Dash Method being used too)!
Mod Edit: Fixed your latex tags - Phy124
« Last Edit: February 14, 2014, 10:06:44 pm by Butt124 »