Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

August 24, 2025, 05:37:24 pm

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2580584 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

BubbleWrapMan

  • Teacher
  • Part of the furniture
  • *
  • Posts: 1110
  • Respect: +97
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1935 on: July 06, 2013, 09:39:30 am »
0
I would say so.
Tim Koussas -- Co-author of ExamPro Mathematical Methods and Specialist Mathematics Study Guides, editor for the Further Mathematics Study Guide.

Current PhD student at La Trobe University.

Nato

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 195
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1936 on: July 08, 2013, 03:35:50 pm »
0
this is a quick question from GMA

regard the ratio of vectors when i have something like why does the ratio between two
of them equal

btw i am expecting it to be as i moved the 5 making


thanks
Class of 2014.

SocialRhubarb

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +34
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1937 on: July 08, 2013, 03:50:28 pm »
0
If you actually think about it, if  , then this implies that vector AP has a greater magnitude, since vector AB is three fifths of AP, so AP must be longer.

It makes sense then, that the ratio   is , since the magnitude of vector AP must be greater than the magnitude of vector AB.
Fight me.

jono88

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 104
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1938 on: July 08, 2013, 06:45:26 pm »
0
In question 4iii)

Is y=5.2 a mistake? My answer is y=2(-6.4)+16=3.2

zvezda

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 520
  • Respect: +1
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1939 on: July 08, 2013, 06:51:20 pm »
0
A spherical ball with radius 24 mm is immersed in an acid bath. The volume of the ball decreases at a (time) rate proportional to the surface area at that instant. If the ball is completely dissolved in 8 minutes, find:
i) the formula connecting radius with time

The answer is apparently, r=24-3t. What gives this away? I can't just assume that this relationship is linear; it could be exponential?
Help appreciated
ATAR: 99.80

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1940 on: July 08, 2013, 06:59:13 pm »
+2
So surface area =


using chain rule



As t = 0, r = 24, c = 24
Also, t = 8, r = 0
So r = -3t + 24

if r is in mm and t is in min
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1941 on: July 08, 2013, 07:02:37 pm »
+2
Probably seems like a long way of doing it, but this shows why it will be linear.


EDIT: Beaten.
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

aestheticatar

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 52
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1942 on: July 09, 2013, 04:43:37 pm »
0
Hey guys,
Is there a way to do this by hand and hence find an exact answer?
(Despite the question asking for 3dp)

Thanks in advance.
Have a great day! :D

zvezda

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 520
  • Respect: +1
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1943 on: July 09, 2013, 04:56:52 pm »
0
Ah yeah I see it now.
Cheers nlieu and b^3
ATAR: 99.80

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1944 on: July 09, 2013, 05:32:54 pm »
+2
Hey guys,
Is there a way to do this by hand and hence find an exact answer?



So we have:

CAS could give you an exact answer, but you asked for 'by hand' method. I'm sorry, but this is outside of the course, pretty much anything involving integration by parts (eg antidiff of ln(x)) or other calculus methods to find volume (edit: eg shell method which brightsky suggested, but removed his post)

You could, however use your CAS or program such as Wolfram Alpha to find the integral of (ln(x))^2:

from Wolfram Alpha

From here, you can solve normally by substitution of terminals, etc etc.
But again: its outside of the course to find such an integral without aid of CAS :)
« Last Edit: July 09, 2013, 05:58:59 pm by Alwin »
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0

Lasercookie

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3167
  • Respect: +326
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1945 on: July 09, 2013, 06:07:45 pm »
+3
But again: its outside of the course to find such an integral without aid of CAS :)
Yeah, it's pretty much outside of the course, but I guess you could rephrase it as a multiparted integration by recognition question, which would make it possible to evaluate using Year 12 knowledge. You've probably seen a fair bit of integration by recognition in methods, it's comes up in spesh too, right? (I don't remember, I think it does).

You've probably figured out what the integral of is using integration by recognition before. The idea is something along the lines of we want some function that we can differentiate, that will allow us to separate log_e(x) e.g. being the usual example. That question could be worded something like find the derivative of , and hence antidifferentiate .
Spoiler

So what about ? What's something that we can differentiate that will allow us to separate log_e(x)^2? , right? Once we know what the antiderivative of that is, we can evaluate this integral:

So figure out what the integral of log_e(x)^2 is, by diffing xlog_e(x)^2 first
Spoiler

and simplify
Spoiler
We figured out what the integral of log_e(x) was before, so just substitute that in and simplify.
Then evaluate our definite integral
Spoiler
Hence
and simplify
Spoiler
and simplify some more, and there you have your exact value expression

I wouldn't expect that to be on a Year 12 exam, but hopefully that's a way that you might find do-able by hand.

barydos

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 314
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Nossal High School
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1946 on: July 09, 2013, 08:48:13 pm »
0
10b. Find an equation for the circle, then try rotating around the axis, restricting the part you rotating by using terminals in terms of
Spoiler


Part a is asking for an expression for the volume if you filled any shape of height H up fully. While part b asks for the volume when you only half fill it up. They are different because in this case half filling a container of this shape that is 10 cm high is not the same as completely filling a container of this shape that is 5 cm high.

What you need to do for part b is similar to the previous problem, set up the volume of revolution integral, but with the lower terminal as zero, and the upper terminal as .

Sorry I'm a bit late in responding, but I was a bit busy. Thank you for your help!
Umm, in terms of question 15 b), while doing all the algebra and what not, I managed to simplify the thing down to

Is there a trick somewhere in dividing the (b-a) ? The only thing I could do was long division, just wondering if there was a shortcut here somewhere. THANKS AGAIN!
2012: Methods [47] | Chinese SL [35]
2013: Specialist [48] | Chemistry [41] | Physics [44] | English Language [40]
ATAR: 99.55

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1947 on: July 09, 2013, 09:21:37 pm »
+3
Sorry I'm a bit late in responding, but I was a bit busy. Thank you for your help!
Umm, in terms of question 15 b), while doing all the algebra and what not, I managed to simplify the thing down to

Is there a trick somewhere in dividing the (b-a) ? The only thing I could do was long division, just wondering if there was a shortcut here somewhere. THANKS AGAIN!
I'm a little bit confused as to how you got in the denominator? This is how I would have simplified it.
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

barydos

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 314
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Nossal High School
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1948 on: July 10, 2013, 12:08:19 pm »
0
I'm a little bit confused as to how you got in the denominator? This is how I would have simplified it.

Ah, on the line of integration, I didn't expand the when I integrated so I got the as a coefficient of a cubic, so then I had to perform long division in the very end to get rid of
So yeah, I think I like your method better, I should've expanded haha, thanks again!
2012: Methods [47] | Chinese SL [35]
2013: Specialist [48] | Chemistry [41] | Physics [44] | English Language [40]
ATAR: 99.55

Alwin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Respect: +241
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #1949 on: July 10, 2013, 08:28:08 pm »
0
Hey guys :) I had a q about assumed knowledge. This is from the Heinemann textbook, chapter review (and yes, before you ask, I do do questions from other textbooks.. just for the sake of it)



My (geometric) approach was:


I'm just not sure if this is in the spesh course, my teacher never mentioned it either... I suppose a spesh method would be to find the intersection using vector methods like scale factors or something.

Does someone know if that is an acceptable method?? thanks!
2012:  Methods [48] Physics [49]
2013:  English [40] (oops) Chemistry [46] Spesh [42] Indo SL [34] Uni Maths: Melb UMEP [4.5] Monash MUEP [just for a bit of fun]
2014:  BAeroEng/BComm

A pessimist says a glass is half empty, an optimist says a glass is half full.
An engineer says the glass has a safety factor of 2.0