Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 23, 2025, 04:06:54 am

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2548348 times)  Share 

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Eugenet17

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2820 on: January 07, 2014, 08:52:25 pm »
0
Use De Moivre's thereom:


We can re-write as , which, using polar form multiplication properties, is equal to .
Now, since we are reflecting the complex number in the x-axis when taking its conjugate, we simply place a negative in front of the principle argument.
So the final answer is 

Thank you so much! :)

Eugenet17

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2821 on: January 08, 2014, 05:12:31 pm »
0
Im getting the Argument wrong for these two questions and im not sure why:




brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2822 on: January 08, 2014, 05:17:33 pm »
+1
i (sqrt(3) - i)^7 = cis(pi/2) (2cis(-pi/6))^7 = 2^7 cis(pi/2) cis(-7pi/6) = 2^7 cis(-2pi/3)

(1+sqrt(3)i)^3/(i(1-i)^5) = (2cis(pi/3))^3/[cis(pi/2)(sqrt(2) cis(-pi/4))^5] = 8 cis(pi)/[4sqrt(2) cis(-3pi/4)] = 2sqrt(2) cis(-pi/4)

hopefully no errors...
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

Eugenet17

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2823 on: January 08, 2014, 05:27:12 pm »
0
i (sqrt(3) - i)^7 = cis(pi/2) (2cis(-pi/6))^7 = 2^7 cis(pi/2) cis(-7pi/6) = 2^7 cis(-2pi/3)

(1+sqrt(3)i)^3/(i(1-i)^5) = (2cis(pi/3))^3/[cis(pi/2)(sqrt(2) cis(-pi/4))^5] = 8 cis(pi)/[4sqrt(2) cis(-3pi/4)] = 2sqrt(2) cis(-pi/4)

hopefully no errors...

Ah that's right! Silly mistakes on my part, thanks :)

Eugenet17

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2824 on: January 11, 2014, 01:15:43 pm »
0
How do i solve z^4-2z^2+4=0 in polar form?

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2825 on: January 11, 2014, 02:47:53 pm »
+2
There's a couple of ways you could do it. This is how I'd tackle it:

Look if you get stuck




(completing the square)

(factorising)

(employing the difference of perfect squares method)

(factorising)





(employing De Moivre's theorem)

(converting to polar form)

(equating both sides)





(equating both sides)





 

 



(equating both sides)





 

 




I know that there's quite a few shortcuts that you can take in that method, but hopefully you'll understand it a lot better with the whole workings. :)
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Eugenet17

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2826 on: January 11, 2014, 06:23:42 pm »
0
There's a couple of ways you could do it. This is how I'd tackle it:

Look if you get stuck




(completing the square)

(factorising)

(employing the difference of perfect squares method)

(factorising)





(employing De Moivre's theorem)

(converting to polar form)

(equating both sides)





(equating both sides)





 

 



(equating both sides)





 

 




I know that there's quite a few shortcuts that you can take in that method, but hopefully you'll understand it a lot better with the whole workings. :)

Thanks alot! I didn't think to let y=z^2 -.-

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2827 on: January 12, 2014, 10:52:18 am »
0
The key thing to remember is that since all the co-efficients were real numbers, all complex solutions occur in conjugate pairs. I've pretended to ignore that so that you can see the whole process, but that shortens the question down quite a bit.
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2828 on: January 12, 2014, 01:22:40 pm »
+7
Here is my favourite way of doing the question.


So set the numerator to zero while avoiding where the denom is zero. I trust this new equation is easier to solve.

How did I come up with this? By recognising the difference of two cubes formula and the similarities with the question.  It's a dodgy method but I think it's cool.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2829 on: January 12, 2014, 02:09:06 pm »
+2
Here is my favourite way of doing the question.


So set the numerator to zero while avoiding where the denom is zero. I trust this new equation is easier to solve.

How did I come up with this? By recognising the difference of two cubes formula and the similarities with the question.  It's a dodgy method but I think it's cool.

This is why this kid got a 49 in Specialist Maths.

That's a really cool method; thanks for sharing! :)
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

clıppy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 707
  • Would you like help?
  • Respect: +68
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2830 on: January 12, 2014, 05:17:59 pm »
0
Bit stuck on a vectors question here, how do you show that two vectors intersect? I've attached the related question from the essentials textbook
2013 : VCE
2014 : VCE
2015 : UoM


Putting this here so I don't forget about it: http://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Tutoring in Chemistry. PM if interested.

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2831 on: January 12, 2014, 05:26:12 pm »
+1
Let X be the midpoint of DB and Y be the midpoint of CE. Find OX. Find OY. Observe that OX = OY. This proves both that the diagonals intersect and that the diagonals bisect each other. To find the acute angle between the two, use the dot product.
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

Eugenet17

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2832 on: January 12, 2014, 05:36:38 pm »
0
Prove that for any complex number z, if and only if ?

Not sure how to start :x

brightsky

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3136
  • Respect: +200
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2833 on: January 12, 2014, 05:51:24 pm »
+1
'If and only if' problems normally warrant a proof with two parts.

Part 1. Prove that if 3 mod(z-1)^2 = mod(z+1)^2, then mod(z-2)^2 = 3.

3 (z-1)(conj(z) - 1) = (z+1)(conj(z) + 1)
3 (mod(z)^2 - z - conj(z) + 1) = mod(z)^2 + z + conj(z) + 1
3 mod(z)^2 - 3z - 3conj(z) + 3 - mod(z)^2 - z - conj(z) - 1 = 0
2 mod(z)^2 - 4z - 4conj(z) + 2 = 0
mod(z)^2 - 2z - 2conj(z) + 1 = 0
mod(z)^2 - 2z - 2conj(z) + 4 = 3
(z-2)(conj(z) - 2) = 3
mod(z-2)^2 = 3

Part 2. Prove that if mod(z-2)^2 = 3, then 3 mod(z-1)^2 = mod(z+1)^2.

It so happens that Part 2 of the problem has already been proven. We need only to reverse the process above to obtain the proof of Part 2.
2020 - 2021: Master of Public Health, The University of Sydney
2017 - 2020: Doctor of Medicine, The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine, The University of Melbourne
2013 ATAR: 99.95

Currently selling copies of the VCE Chinese Exam Revision Book and UMEP Maths Exam Revision Book, and accepting students for Maths Methods and Specialist Maths Tutoring in 2020!

Eugenet17

  • Guest
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #2834 on: January 12, 2014, 06:02:59 pm »
0
'If and only if' problems normally warrant a proof with two parts.

Part 1. Prove that if 3 mod(z-1)^2 = mod(z+1)^2, then mod(z-2)^2 = 3.

3 (z-1)(conj(z) - 1) = (z+1)(conj(z) + 1)
3 (mod(z)^2 - z - conj(z) + 1) = mod(z)^2 + z + conj(z) + 1
3 mod(z)^2 - 3z - 3conj(z) + 3 - mod(z)^2 - z - conj(z) - 1 = 0
2 mod(z)^2 - 4z - 4conj(z) + 2 = 0
mod(z)^2 - 2z - 2conj(z) + 1 = 0
mod(z)^2 - 2z - 2conj(z) + 4 = 3
(z-2)(conj(z) - 2) = 3
mod(z-2)^2 = 3

Part 2. Prove that if mod(z-2)^2 = 3, then 3 mod(z-1)^2 = mod(z+1)^2.

It so happens that Part 2 of the problem has already been proven. We need only to reverse the process above to obtain the proof of Part 2.

Wait does z x conj(z) = mod(z)^2?

Also, mod(z)^2 - 2z - 2conj(z) + 1 = 0
mod(z)^2 - 2z - 2conj(z) + 4 = 3

Where does the 3 come from?
« Last Edit: January 12, 2014, 06:08:53 pm by Eugenet17 »