Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

August 20, 2025, 05:30:30 am

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2577166 times)  Share 

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

IndefatigableLover

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
  • What kind of shoes do ninjas wear? Sneakers.
  • Respect: +105
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3465 on: August 31, 2014, 11:50:05 am »
0
Functions of a complex variable are functions that take complex numbers as arguments. It is the main area of study of Complex Analysis:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_analysis

Euler's formula is
Nice! I know Euler's Formula is covered in Specialist 3&4 though do we actually cover 'Complex Analysis' in 3&4 or is it just limited to just Complex Numbers?

Valyria

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
  • Respect: +12
  • School: John Monash Science School
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3466 on: August 31, 2014, 12:08:07 pm »
0
Nice! I know Euler's Formula is covered in Specialist 3&4 though do we actually cover 'Complex Analysis' in 3&4 or is it just limited to just Complex Numbers?

This year's graduating specialist maths class of John Monash Science School had an entire SAC based around euler's formula. Although it's beyond the scope of the syllabus, the questions probably required fundamental knowledge for complex numbers, trigonometry and calculus.
2014 ATAR: [99.20]
VCE English positions have been booked out for 2015.
2015: BCom/LLB @ Monash University

keltingmeith

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5493
  • he/him - they is also fine
  • Respect: +1292
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3467 on: August 31, 2014, 12:17:06 pm »
0
Nice! I know Euler's Formula is covered in Specialist 3&4 though do we actually cover 'Complex Analysis' in 3&4 or is it just limited to just Complex Numbers?

Euler's Formula is (regrettably...) NOT covered in specialist, but it is REALLY REALLY COOL, and if you want to learn about it anyway, I highly encourage doing so!

No form of analysis is covered in high school. At all. Trust me, you don't want to cover analysis in VCE.

IndefatigableLover

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
  • What kind of shoes do ninjas wear? Sneakers.
  • Respect: +105
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3468 on: August 31, 2014, 12:24:54 pm »
0
This year's graduating specialist maths class of John Monash Science School had an entire SAC based around euler's formula. Although it's beyond the scope of the syllabus, the questions probably required fundamental knowledge for complex numbers, trigonometry and calculus.
Oh really it's beyond the scope of the syllabus? Well I guess you learn something new everyday.. I've had a look at the past materials on Euler's Formula and it does mention those topics actually!

Euler's Formula is (regrettably...) NOT covered in specialist, but it is REALLY REALLY COOL, and if you want to learn about it anyway, I highly encourage doing so!

No form of analysis is covered in high school. At all. Trust me, you don't want to cover analysis in VCE.
Haha well I'll learning about it at school tomorrow LOL *cries*
Yeah the name kind of spooks me out so yeah.. not looking forward to it >.<

keltingmeith

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5493
  • he/him - they is also fine
  • Respect: +1292
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3469 on: August 31, 2014, 12:27:53 pm »
+1
Don't be scared of it - it's a very nice formula and easy to use. :3 Hell, the derivation of it is actually pretty easy, and covered in one of the first year maths units at Monash.

IndefatigableLover

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1837
  • What kind of shoes do ninjas wear? Sneakers.
  • Respect: +105
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3470 on: August 31, 2014, 12:35:46 pm »
0
Don't be scared of it - it's a very nice formula and easy to use. :3 Hell, the derivation of it is actually pretty easy, and covered in one of the first year maths units at Monash.
Haha that definitely makes me feel more reassured for tomorrow LOL (you see we have a two part analysis task on it but it's a 'learn as you go' type of analysis task so I have no idea what to expect you see :S)

bts

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3471 on: August 31, 2014, 09:11:48 pm »
0
when i am given the cartesian equation: x^2 - y^2 = 1

i got the vector equation: r(t) = 2 sec (t)i + 2 tan (t)j, but how did they get the domain for t as (-pi/2, pi/2)

?

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3472 on: August 31, 2014, 09:22:42 pm »
0
when i am given the cartesian equation: x^2 - y^2 = 1

i got the vector equation: r(t) = 2 sec (t)i + 2 tan (t)j, but how did they get the domain for t as (-pi/2, pi/2)

?

That vector equation and its domain only really give half the hyperbola

But anyway, what they did was to try find the largest domain on which sec t and tan t are continuous. In other words, the largest domain in which cos t is not zero. (-pi/2, pi/2) is one such domain
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

Valyria

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 210
  • Respect: +12
  • School: John Monash Science School
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3473 on: August 31, 2014, 10:38:49 pm »
0
Is it just me or are exam 2's really tough to finish on time? :-\  I try reduce the time spent on MC but I'm always completing them within 40-45 minutes, any tips other than practice more?
2014 ATAR: [99.20]
VCE English positions have been booked out for 2015.
2015: BCom/LLB @ Monash University

keltingmeith

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5493
  • he/him - they is also fine
  • Respect: +1292
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3474 on: August 31, 2014, 10:43:55 pm »
0
Is it just me or are exam 2's really tough to finish on time? :-\  I try reduce the time spent on MC but I'm always completing them within 40-45 minutes, any tips other than practice more?

Do MC last, but also try to do a couple during reading time, and just put the answer into your short term memory to colour in once writing time starts.

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3475 on: August 31, 2014, 11:06:36 pm »
+1
Don't be scared of it - it's a very nice formula and easy to use. :3 Hell, the derivation of it is actually pretty easy, and covered in one of the first year maths units at Monash.

If any VCE students want a very simple proof, here it is.
Differentiate e^-ix * (cos x + i sin x) by product rule, treating i as a constant such that i^2 = -1
Of course, you just differentiated cis x / e^ix. And you should get 0 as all the factors should cancel perfectly
So you know this quotient is a constant. Sub in x = 0 and you see that this quotient is 1. Proof done.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

kinslayer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Respect: +30
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3476 on: September 01, 2014, 12:26:16 am »
+1

juzza12

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3477 on: September 05, 2014, 04:15:16 pm »
0
A question from VCAA Specialist exam 2 2013. I have absolutely no idea how to approach part ii of this question, I get that the line segment is of y=x, my teacher suggested trial and error but otherwise I have no clue how to write the complex equation in terms of z conjugate. A worked solution of the exam stated the equation through pretty much recognition but I don't see it. Any help would be appreciated!

kinslayer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 761
  • Respect: +30
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3478 on: September 05, 2014, 04:27:55 pm »
+3
After you plot the four points, you should be able to see that they form a square.

Now draw the line going through and and also the line going through and . You can see they intersect at the origin but importantly, they intersect at right angles (because they are diagonals of a square).

From there, you should be able to see that, at any point along the line through and , the distance from to is the same as the distance from to .

That is: .

juzza12

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #3479 on: September 05, 2014, 05:46:42 pm »
0
After you plot the four points, you should be able to see that they form a square.

Now draw the line going through and and also the line going through and . You can see they intersect at the origin but importantly, they intersect at right angles (because they are diagonals of a square).

From there, you should be able to see that, at any point along the line through and , the distance from to is the same as the distance from to .

That is: .
Thanks but I'm still confused :/