Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 20, 2025, 04:14:19 pm

Author Topic: VCE Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!  (Read 2603589 times)  Share 

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Shadowxo

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 983
  • Graphing is where I draw the line.
  • Respect: +516
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8835 on: August 27, 2017, 12:40:13 pm »
+1
Awesome, thanks for the help! If anyone is willing to help with the other parts of the dynamics question I would be forever grateful...
What parts of it are you stuck on? If you post your working I can show you where you went wrong :)
Completed VCE 2016
2015: Biology
2016: Methods | Physics | Chemistry | Specialist Maths | Literature
ATAR : 97.90
2017: BSci (Maths and Engineering) at MelbUni
Feel free to pm me if you have any questions!

tinagranger

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8836 on: August 27, 2017, 01:19:55 pm »
0
What parts of it are you stuck on? If you post your working I can show you where you went wrong :)

I've figured out how to do a) but am getting the wrong answer for b i) and ii)  ???
For i) I solved F - 6888 = 0.1 x 60000
ii) I solved F - 360 - 12,000g x 1/200 = 0.1 x 60000

Thanks!
2016: Methods
2017: English Chemistry Specialist Chinese Japanese

Shadowxo

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 983
  • Graphing is where I draw the line.
  • Respect: +516
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8837 on: August 27, 2017, 02:26:32 pm »
+4
I've figured out how to do a) but am getting the wrong answer for b i) and ii)  ???
For i) I solved F - 6888 = 0.1 x 60000
ii) I solved F - 360 - 12,000g x 1/200 = 0.1 x 60000

Thanks!
You've almost got it :)
i) So, sum of all forces = ma
F-6888=0.1*(60000+12000) as the force is the total force on the truck + engine, and you're looking at the whole system.
The total force acting on truck + engine is F-6888, not on the engine individually.
If you were just using 60000, you'd be looking only at the forces on the engine (ie tension weight resistance and tractive force)

Try ii) with that :)
Completed VCE 2016
2015: Biology
2016: Methods | Physics | Chemistry | Specialist Maths | Literature
ATAR : 97.90
2017: BSci (Maths and Engineering) at MelbUni
Feel free to pm me if you have any questions!

tinagranger

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Respect: 0
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8838 on: August 27, 2017, 09:35:07 pm »
0
Hi, urgent!! Can someone please tell me if friction is at a maximum (i.e. Fr = mew N) when the block is ALREADY MOVING?
2016: Methods
2017: English Chemistry Specialist Chinese Japanese

Sine

  • Werewolf
  • National Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 5132
  • Respect: +2103
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8839 on: August 27, 2017, 09:39:07 pm »
+4
Hi, urgent!! Can someone please tell me if friction is at a maximum (i.e. Fr = mew N) when the block is ALREADY MOVING?
FrMAX =  μN  is the technically the "correct" formula :)

Friction is always at it's maximum if the block is moving on a non-smooth surface. However you can have max friction when the block is stationary. This would mean the block is "on the verge of moving" i.e. An extra bit of force would be too much for the maximum friction hence net force and therefore an acceleration occurs.

Rieko Ioane

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Respect: +3
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8840 on: September 02, 2017, 04:22:31 pm »
0
Hello, I need help on this MCQ. Why does testing each option in to the equation not work? Option E gives LHS = RHS but the answer is D http://imgur.com/a/AV0bN

Ty

VanillaRice

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 657
  • Respect: +278
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8841 on: September 02, 2017, 04:40:14 pm »
+5
Hello, I need help on this MCQ. Why does testing each option in to the equation not work? Option E gives LHS = RHS but the answer is D http://imgur.com/a/AV0bN

Ty
I think you've gotten a few negatives mixed up. It might help to test each option somewhere with more space, or even on your calculator.
For E, LHS should be:
3(6 - 2i) - (6 + 2i)
= 18 - 12i -6 - 2i

Hope this helps :)
VCE 2015-16
2017-20: BSc (Stats)/BBiomedSc [Monash]

Sine

  • Werewolf
  • National Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 5132
  • Respect: +2103
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8842 on: September 02, 2017, 04:43:55 pm »
+6
Hello, I need help on this MCQ. Why does testing each option in to the equation not work? Option E gives LHS = RHS but the answer is D http://imgur.com/a/AV0bN

Ty
find solution attatched

sorry if it isn't that neat (only used my laptop trackpad)



Rieko Ioane

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Respect: +3
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8843 on: September 03, 2017, 02:27:23 pm »
0
Could someone check my method for this question? I think it's different to what the answer has. http://imgur.com/a/aJ2Z0

Pretty much point A = (500,450) and OP(plane's path) = 30(0.5t^2 + t)i + 20(0.5t^2 - t)j is the info required to do this q.

Thanks

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8844 on: September 03, 2017, 02:45:51 pm »
+7
Could someone check my method for this question? I think it's different to what the answer has. http://imgur.com/a/aJ2Z0

Pretty much point A = (500,450) and OP(plane's path) = 30(0.5t^2 + t)i + 20(0.5t^2 - t)j is the info required to do this q.

Thanks

Your method is sufficient.

(btw you have used 400 instead of 500, but you should still get t1 =/= t2)
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

Rieko Ioane

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Respect: +3
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8845 on: September 03, 2017, 07:34:25 pm »
0
Your method is sufficient.

(btw you have used 400 instead of 500, but you should still get t1 =/= t2)
Ah dammit, oops. Thanks though!

Rieko Ioane

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Respect: +3
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8846 on: September 05, 2017, 07:18:44 pm »
0
Hello, for part a https://ibb.co/fyrsta
The question found the average value of the confidence interval (ie the mean of the sample mean). But the mean of the sample =/= the sample mean? So why can we do this?

Thanks

Sine

  • Werewolf
  • National Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 5132
  • Respect: +2103
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8847 on: September 05, 2017, 07:26:59 pm »
+8
Hello, for part a https://ibb.co/fyrsta
The question found the average value of the confidence interval (ie the mean of the sample mean). But the mean of the sample =/= the sample mean? So why can we do this?

Thanks
so remember when you create a C.I you use the sample mean that has been found which is x-bar.

The "end values " of the C.I is a result of plus/minus 1.96 * standard error to the sample mean.

That is why you can find sample mean from "end values" of the C.I.



Rieko Ioane

  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Respect: +3
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8848 on: September 05, 2017, 08:53:48 pm »
0
so remember when you create a C.I you use the sample mean that has been found which is x-bar.

The "end values " of the C.I is a result of plus/minus 1.96 * standard error to the sample mean.

That is why you can find sample mean from "end values" of the C.I.
Thanks I see.

For example, if this question did not give us a confidence interval, then we would say that the sample mean equals mew, as this is what we would expect it to be? Because we have no other info anymore?

Sine

  • Werewolf
  • National Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *****
  • Posts: 5132
  • Respect: +2103
Re: Specialist 3/4 Question Thread!
« Reply #8849 on: September 05, 2017, 08:57:39 pm »
+7
Thanks I see.

For example, if this question did not give us a confidence interval, then we would say that the sample mean equals mew, as this is what we would expect it to be? Because we have no other info anymore?
you will either get
1) sample mean given explictly to you
2a) implicitly given to you via a confidence interval
2b) implicitly given to you through raw data