It's good that they're harsh markers...
But that doesn't mean they have to give 'bad' grades to VCAA.
A lot of (smart) teachers will standardise SAC marks, i.e. if the class does overall poorly on a SAC
This year we had one SAC which the class averaged somewhere around 65% - I got like 90% and ended up with a 48 and half the class got above 40 - but the teacher realised we would do much better on the exam then that SAC mark compared to the rest of the state so he gave somewhere around..30% of the class A+ another 30% A etc.
We only had 2 students go through receiving A+ in every SAC, even though we had 50% of the class in the top 8% of the state.
Therefore not disadvantaging us come December 15th.
A teacher has the freedom to play around with SAC grades, and they should if they're smart and know what it takes to get high scores. Teachers should aim to give SAC marks respective of the expected exam score.
Having said that, I think it's pointless when teachers continuously administer easy SACs, allowing smart students to achieve 95%+ consistently with minimal study involved. So many times these kids get too far ahead of themselves and are disappointed come December 15th when they score a 36.
Having looked at the statistics for subjects from last year, in many subjects 18% of students get A+ on the SACs but only 8% get A+ on the exam (or similar to this).
In summary, goto a good school and SACs don't matter
