Kim Jong-il is dead

[Camo]

Doesn't this mean that his son, who is even more of a maniac than he is, comes into power now?

I'm just going to say it, as long as your not their leader nacho I think things will be all right.

[Random_Guy]

I guess you could say that Kim Jong was.... Il. 

[damo707]

I guess you could say it's the end of his Korea

[nacho]

Doesn't this mean that his son, who is even more of a maniac than he is, comes into power now?

I'm just going to say it, as long as your not their leader nacho I think things will be all right.

this unprovoked attack makes me unhappy

[burbs]

Yeah but in FB where?
give me a link .

Mate, I'm assuming we have different friends on facebook.

[Hutchoo]

Saw this on a friends FB. LOL'd a lot, so I thought I'd share.

.

[Special At Specialist]

I didn't even know who Kim Jong II was until they announced his death...

[abd123]

Were the civilians of North Koreans were force to cry in front of the media?

Did the communists told the civilians to confront their sorrows and emotion in front of the media (due to Kim Jong-il's death)?

sorry for being rude, but thats just my natural instincts.

[nacho]

Were the civilians of North Koreans were force to cry in front of the media?

Did the communists told the civilians to confront their sorrows and emotion in front of the media (due to Kim Jong-il's death)?

sorry for being rude, but thats just my natural instincts.

I'm guessing that they weren't directly told to cry.
But if you don't cry, you'd be the black sheep in the crowd and probably get jailed/killed

[funkyducky]

abd123: The lack of precision and clarity in your post makes it hard for me to tell what your point is. Are you implying they were forced or weren't? Where are you going with this? Natural instincts = angry at oppression or all people deserve to be treated well, even KJI?

Really, that post could be interpreted either way.

EDIT: My personal opinion: The oppression of the North Korean people is horrendous, but it's wrong to celebrate a death, no matter whose death it is.

[abd123]

Were the civilians of North Koreans were force to cry in front of the media?

Did the communists told the civilians to confront their sorrows and emotion in front of the media (due to Kim Jong-il's death)?

sorry for being rude, but thats just my natural instincts.

I'm guessing that they weren't directly told to cry.
But if you don't cry, you'd be the black sheep in the crowd and probably get jailed/killed

Something close to that, i just don't know if they weren't crying for him for real or not. It just seemed like there was a brute force upon the civilians to do what they are told from the communists.

@Funkyducky, sorry my english fails lol, I guess i was implying that they were force to cry. Sorry for the confusion ignore my stupidity, i just use longwords and cool words to sound smart i guess its not working :/.

[funkyducky]

^ Nah that's fine. Making sense > big words

[Dominatorrr]

LOL, some American politician pronounced him as "Kim Jong the second".

I think it would have helped if he had seen this: KIM JONG-IL
instead of this: Kim Jong-Il

[Sellingman]

Were the civilians of North Koreans were force to cry in front of the media?

Did the communists told the civilians to confront their sorrows and emotion in front of the media (due to Kim Jong-il's death)?

sorry for being rude, but thats just my natural instincts.

You are seriously delusional, you cannot force that many people to convey sadness and grief.

The regime they have been subject has for lack of a better word 'brainwashed' them into believing that their leader was actually all that the government claimed he was. These people are genuinely upset and distraught.

[pi]

This is my honest opinion, but I also felt that the crying was pretty much staged. Sure, there would be some in grief and shock, but I think all the scenes we see on Western television is what they WANT us to see, and I can't see how that isn't staged.