Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

January 31, 2026, 08:17:10 am

Author Topic: Biology Post-exam Discussion  (Read 56733 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jenny_2108

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 603
  • School: Melbourne Girls College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2012, 12:43:21 pm »
Think a lot of people would've forgotten ligation in dna replication.

Shit. Forgot that one. Hope that 4 marks is not solely dependent on getting everything in there because there are a lot of things going on in DNA replication =/

I showed the process using 4 steps, I think the mark allocation would be something like:

-Unzipping of the double-helix by DNA Helicase
-Binding of RNA primers to the separated strands of DNA
-DNA polymerase elongates the primers by adding new DNA nucleotides, needed to show leading strand and lagging strands (okazaki fragments)
-Ligation by DNA Ligase

I did all of that but instead of ligation I had the direction of synthesis and the 5' to 3' or whatever thingo.

I thought direction is from 3' to 5'? :O
Btw, if I write primers only (without saying RNA primers), is it ok?

How did you ans part a of the last ques? Evidence of skeleton that they climb the tree?
I feel so bad  now, there are lots of vocabulary I didn't understand at all. I saw the ques and was like wth, what does this word mean. Probably just me because I'm ESL student ==
2012: Bio | Chem| Spesh | Methods | ESL | Vietnamese
2013-2016: BActuarial studies/BCommerce @ ANU

Thanks to gossamer, TT, pi, laserblued, Thus for helping and supporting me during VCE

HighLatency

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 390
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2012, 12:49:33 pm »
Opposable thumbs (+feet)?

w.e I hope the guy who wrote the exam just undergoes simultaneous, whole body apoptosis...

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2012, 12:49:58 pm »
Think a lot of people would've forgotten ligation in dna replication.

Shit. Forgot that one. Hope that 4 marks is not solely dependent on getting everything in there because there are a lot of things going on in DNA replication =/

I showed the process using 4 steps, I think the mark allocation would be something like:

-Unzipping of the double-helix by DNA Helicase
-Binding of RNA primers to the separated strands of DNA
-DNA polymerase elongates the primers by adding new DNA nucleotides, needed to show leading strand and lagging strands (okazaki fragments)
-Ligation by DNA Ligase

I did all of that but instead of ligation I had the direction of synthesis and the 5' to 3' or whatever thingo.

I thought direction is from 3' to 5'? :O
Btw, if I write primers only (without saying RNA primers), is it ok?

How did you ans part a of the last ques? Evidence of skeleton that they climb the tree?
I feel so bad  now, there are lots of vocabulary I didn't understand at all. I saw the ques and was like wth, what does this word mean. Probably just me because I'm ESL student ==

It's read in a 3' to 5' direction, but the new DNA strand can only be made in a 5' to 3' direction. I think HighLatency was just talking about the labelling of each end of DNA.

I think I said something like opposable thumbs, allowing them to grip onto the trees better. But my friends said the femur bone could've been more angled, and hence less bi-pedalism and therefore the species would be more suited to climbing around trees to escape predation etc
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

itsdanny

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2012, 12:50:35 pm »
Anyone by chance took a copy of the exam? Would like to have a look at one particular question.

Sent by Android

HighLatency

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 390
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2012, 12:53:07 pm »
I think gorillas have straight legs but they don't climb trees....I think.

achre

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 734
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2012, 01:08:37 pm »
I said opposable thumbs and prehensile feet, so small fossils of hands/feet exhibiting those characteristics would lead scientists to conclude they were small in stature and could climb trees?
 >:(

Gazillionaire

  • Guest
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2012, 01:13:52 pm »
arms of the fossils were longer than the legs of the fossils - this is very common in hominoids that brachiate

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #22 on: November 02, 2012, 01:17:04 pm »
That sounds like the best answer, actually.

VCAA may accept alternative answers but don't count on it.
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

alphamale

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • 'Never look down unless your helping someone up'
  • School: Melbourne High School
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #23 on: November 02, 2012, 01:39:39 pm »
How did everyone go?
Personally it was a bit like last semester when it was slightly easy, but some tricky questions.

Only difference was multiple choice was easier than i thought  ;D
:)

InsaneMcFries

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 308
  • Biology Nerd | Maths Fan
  • School: Flinders Christian Community College (Tyabb)
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #24 on: November 02, 2012, 01:40:51 pm »
Anyone else not see the question where you put the x on the graph? :P
Subjects
2012: English [37], Biology [41], Specialist Maths [33], Methods [39], Physics [37]; ATAR [94.65]
2013-2015: BSc. at UoM

itsdanny

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 138
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #25 on: November 02, 2012, 01:41:00 pm »
arms of the fossils were longer than the legs of the fossils - this is very common in hominoids that brachiate

Same thing I thought, although it did not mention anything about brachiation, but rather "climbing", unless climbing trees goes is correlated to swinging on trees? But damn, I should've went with my first answer.. thought too much about swinging, rather than the stem of the question that states climbing.

Think a lot of people would've forgotten ligation in dna replication.

Shit. Forgot that one. Hope that 4 marks is not solely dependent on getting everything in there because there are a lot of things going on in DNA replication =/

I showed the process using 4 steps, I think the mark allocation would be something like:

-Unzipping of the double-helix by DNA Helicase
-Binding of RNA primers to the separated strands of DNA
-DNA polymerase elongates the primers by adding new DNA nucleotides, needed to show leading strand and lagging strands (okazaki fragments)
-Ligation by DNA Ligase

Instead of drawing images of DNA replication, I transcribed it instead, and placed it into a flow-chart concept kind of illustration. Would this still be accepted since it did just ambiguously say a 'diagram', which necessarily could imply any sort of communicable form of information?

Anyone else not see the question where you put the x on the graph? :P

Had one friend who did that! I guess that's what happens when you're under pressure I would think. What did you get for the age after calculating the half-lives?
« Last Edit: November 02, 2012, 01:44:21 pm by itsdanny »

Shenz0r

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1875
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #26 on: November 02, 2012, 01:47:17 pm »
Instead of drawing images of DNA replication, I transcribed it instead, and placed it into a flow-chart concept kind of illustration. Would this still be accepted since it did just ambiguously say a 'diagram', which necessarily could imply any sort of communicable form of information?

It did say a "labelled" diagram, so I think it was asking for a drawn representation.

Don't worry about it too much though I reckon
2012 ATAR: 99.20
2013-2015: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Microbiology/Immunology: Infections and Immunity) at The University of Melbourne
2016-2019: Doctor of Medicine (MD4) at The University of Melbourne

lollypop96

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #27 on: November 02, 2012, 01:59:52 pm »
Is a strong collar bone for brachiation a valid answer for the climbing trees one?

laurameulman

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • School: Highvale Secondary College
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #28 on: November 02, 2012, 02:18:40 pm »
I thought it was slightly harder than unit 3's exam but still fair.

For the climbing trees one i said having opposable digits to be able to grab onto tree branches etc.

I found the first multiple choice question quite ambiguous. It asked something about the structure shown and the centromere was labelled, i think it could have been interpreted that the question was about the centromere and not the entire chromosome. Thoughts? Anyway, i said it was found in all eukaryotic organisms (i think).

barrry321

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • School: melbourne high
Re: Biology Post-exam Discussion
« Reply #29 on: November 02, 2012, 02:20:34 pm »
where did you guys put the X on the graph and do you guys remeber how many years it was?