Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 15, 2025, 09:36:47 am

Author Topic: How did you go?  (Read 60635 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dejan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 942
  • straya m8
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #45 on: November 09, 2012, 06:21:40 pm »
Yeah I think it was proclamation. Damn!!!
Really eager to get a copy of the exam to confirm whether it was assent or proclamation ><

Hannah_Banana

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #46 on: November 09, 2012, 06:22:39 pm »
I think it was proclamation as it was published in the Gazette. Tricky question. A date doesn't necessarily need to be mentioned as a law can come into operation 28 days after publication :/ Hard first question!
2012
ATAR: 87.30
English (37), Legal Studies (38), Further Maths (32), Psychology (43), Revolutions (34) and Studio Arts (38)

2013: Arts at the University of Melbourne and eventually doing a post-grad in law

Dejan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 942
  • straya m8
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #47 on: November 09, 2012, 06:27:29 pm »
I think it was proclamation as it was published in the Gazette. Tricky question. A date doesn't necessarily need to be mentioned as a law can come into operation 28 days after publication :/ Hard first question!
Exactly very tricky, my bad you're right ><

RockyStarPro

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #48 on: November 09, 2012, 06:29:56 pm »
I wonder how much people would have gotten question 1 right...not much I'm guessing. Even if it fooled the smartest Legal student at my school!

But apart from that the exam was okay. Could have done better in the "How do courts change law" question and the essay. Expecting around a 55/70, dunno if I can get that but let's hope :)

cccc

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • School: camberwell high
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #49 on: November 09, 2012, 06:30:21 pm »
Hansaard is not limited to publishing at proclomation

eeps

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2532
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #50 on: November 09, 2012, 06:30:56 pm »
Was it easier or harder than last year's exam? If anyone has a spare copy of the exam, could they upload it.

Dejan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 942
  • straya m8
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #51 on: November 09, 2012, 06:31:31 pm »
Was it easier or harder than last year's exam? If anyone has a spare copy of the exam, could they upload it.
Felt much easier really, don't have a copy :(

cccc

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • School: camberwell high
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #52 on: November 09, 2012, 06:32:11 pm »
plus the question asked what stage is being referred to in the article. It was referring to royal assent, there was no mention of proclamation

sadboy222

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #53 on: November 09, 2012, 06:33:45 pm »
dam proclomation! lol

Hannah_Banana

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #54 on: November 09, 2012, 06:35:25 pm »
plus the question asked what stage is being referred to in the article. It was referring to royal assent, there was no mention of proclamation

You could be right! :) Hard to tell without a copy of the exam and my mind has gone to mush
2012
ATAR: 87.30
English (37), Legal Studies (38), Further Maths (32), Psychology (43), Revolutions (34) and Studio Arts (38)

2013: Arts at the University of Melbourne and eventually doing a post-grad in law

Pa007

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • School: NHS
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #55 on: November 09, 2012, 06:36:22 pm »
That first question was very tricky, I stated that it was royal assent but I did mention proclamation.
For the court question about changing the law, I didn't mention the precedents at all.
Now i'm worried because all I talked about was interpretation, doctrine of ultra vires and applying a statute to a case and thus outlining it's use.
 
Anyway, all in all it was much trickier and harder then previous years, very surprised to hear people say it was easy.

ThyJovan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 96
  • Ain't no fortunate son.
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #56 on: November 09, 2012, 06:36:56 pm »
I just saw the word assented and went for it hahaha
2012: English [37] | Literature [34] | History: Revolutions [43] | Legal Studies [37] | Business Management [36] | Media [41]

ATAR: 91.05

2013-2017: Law/Arts at LaTrobe University - Bundoora

sadboy222

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #57 on: November 09, 2012, 06:37:00 pm »
what did you guys talk about for the section 109 question? Does it restrict states ?

It does to an extend but did you have to talk about residual powers? wasnt sure how to get full marks for that one

Tragesty

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • School: Wheelers Hill Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #58 on: November 09, 2012, 06:38:06 pm »
So do most people think it was easier than last years? What was the 10 marker? (did it last year)

sadboy222

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 268
Re: How did you go?
« Reply #59 on: November 09, 2012, 06:38:24 pm »
I just saw the word assented and went for it hahaha

LOL THIS!

i didnt even read it all i saw as ".......Governor-General.......................... assent......"

my mind was like yep royal assent lol