Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

January 24, 2026, 05:24:58 am

Author Topic: Suggested Answers - Illuminati  (Read 25670 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tonychet2

  • Guest
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2012, 01:52:03 pm »
Also q4. bi) and bii) don't they round up to 8.4*10^-4 M
I got 8.4 too, but wasn't it to the power of -5? My memory fails me.

Also, what would 7 dropped on the midyear and 1 dropped today get me, with 100% SACs?

46-48

oneoneoneone

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Meow meow, meow meow meow woof.
  • School: Socth Clogeg
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2012, 01:52:53 pm »
Wasn't the cutoff for midyear about 7 marks off though? I doubt you could get a 45+ with a Low High High A+

WhoTookMyUsername

  • Guest
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2012, 01:53:57 pm »
i think you could touch 45/46 possibly, but nothing higher, realistically 43-46 probs?

charmanderp

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3209
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #33 on: November 13, 2012, 01:54:53 pm »
  b) The value in the databook refers to the reaction of methanol in which the co-efficient in front of methanol is 1. There is 2 in the equation in part a.ii. and hence the value is approximately twice as large.

I'm not sure about this one. It specifies the value for delta H calculated using the enthalpy of combustion, and given that we had to multiply it by 2 to get the mark for the previous answer I think this was already assumed. If this is right I think that question's a bit silly.

What if we wrote that they were different because the experiment we used might not have occurred at SLC, or the methanol sample was impure?

Damn stupid mistakes on the midyear ):
University of Melbourne - Bachelor of Arts majoring in English, Economics and International Studies (2013 onwards)

DJing

  • Guest
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #34 on: November 13, 2012, 01:55:56 pm »
If I lost 4 marks in the mid-year and 3-4 in today's paper and did well in my SACs what study score can I expect (I know it depends but I just want a rough estimate)? Thanks.

like 45-48 easy

:O Really? woah

Tonychet2

  • Guest
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #35 on: November 13, 2012, 01:56:33 pm »
how is question 15 mc D?

oneoneoneone

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Meow meow, meow meow meow woof.
  • School: Socth Clogeg
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #36 on: November 13, 2012, 01:57:23 pm »
You need to add the 33kJ required to convert the water from liquid to gas form.

Tonychet2

  • Guest
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #37 on: November 13, 2012, 01:58:48 pm »
You need to add the 33kJ required to convert the water from liquid to gas form.

what 33kj? where do u get that value from

dfgjgddjidfg

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
  • School: fffsddfs
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #38 on: November 13, 2012, 01:59:16 pm »
it says 55kj was needed to convert water from 20-100 degrees and then it says how much energy needed to raise 100g from 0-100 degrees. dodgy question

davo_10

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • School: st bedes
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #39 on: November 13, 2012, 01:59:49 pm »
For Q9 on the multi-choice

Isn't the answer A because the K value is higher than the equilibrium value, so the forward rate is greater than the backward rate?

dfgjgddjidfg

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
  • School: fffsddfs
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #40 on: November 13, 2012, 02:01:59 pm »
what could i get with A sacs ranked two in medium cohort. High A exam 1 low A+ exam 2?

pezz619

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • School: Melbourne High School
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #41 on: November 13, 2012, 02:02:47 pm »
Nah it says 54kj per mole to convert liquid water to steam at 100
So you have to calculate energy from 20-100 and then liquid water to steam at 100

baddin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • flash mamba
  • School: Mill Park Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #42 on: November 13, 2012, 02:03:41 pm »
Was this exam worth 72 marks???? I dont remember now
Flash Mamba!!
2012 : [ESL] [Physics] [Chemistry] [Further] [Methods] [Specialists]
2011 : [Legal]

illuminati

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #43 on: November 13, 2012, 02:03:56 pm »
For Q9 on the multi-choice

Isn't the answer A because the K value is higher than the equilibrium value, so the forward rate is greater than the backward rate?

The concentration fraction was greater than K, so backwards > forwards.
2010: Chinese SL (36 ---> 45.6), Accounting (48 ---> 48.4)
2011: English (47), Methods (50), Spesh (43 ----> 52.7), Chemistry (48 ----> 49.3), Physics (38)
ATAR: 99.90
2011 UMAT:
S1:[105] S2:[45] S3:[90] Overall:[80] Percentile: 100th

Need chem/methods tutoring?
I'm offering it based predominantly in the south-eastern suburbs (Caulfield-ish) - PM me.

Tonychet2

  • Guest
Re: Suggested Answers (work in progress)
« Reply #44 on: November 13, 2012, 02:04:04 pm »
  b) The value in the databook refers to the reaction of methanol in which the co-efficient in front of methanol is 1. There is 2 in the equation in part a.ii. and hence the value is approximately twice as large.

I'm not sure about this one. It specifies the value for delta H calculated using the enthalpy of combustion, and given that we had to multiply it by 2 to get the mark for the previous answer I think this was already assumed. If this is right I think that question's a bit silly.

What if we wrote that they were different because the experiment we used might not have occurred at SLC, or the methanol sample was impure?

Damn stupid mistakes on the midyear ):

isnt the answer because some heat energy is lost from poor insulation? therefore the temperature increases less and the calculated delta H value of methanol is lower