Is that

?
Anyway it doesn't matter if it is or isn't, it's pretty much the same process you'd take for any graph. To sketch this, just note what the base graph would have been, and then look at each of the transformations applied to it to get the graph we want.
In this case the base graph would be something like

You should be able to sketch this graph.
So it's going to be some kind of exponential graph, with a few transformations
We can see that the transformations on the graph are
- Translated down 3 units parallel to the y-axis
- Dilated along the y-axis by a factor of 2
- Reflection in the x-axis (so it's going to be flipped upside down)
- Dilated along the x-axis by a factor of 1/2
So that gives us a pretty good idea of what the graph will look like. (an upside down exponential graph that's been moved down by three units)
Before drawing those in, let's find the intercepts and asymptotes.
What do we know about

It'd have a horizontal asymptote at y = 0 (this won't change after reflection either). Our graph has been translated down by three, so we have an asymptote at y = -3
Due to that asympote there won't be any x-intercepts (it's an upside down exponential graph). We can find the y-intercept by subbing in x = 0

So we can mark that down, and just sketch in the general shape. For showing the dilations just have the graph a bit more squished or stretched than it would have been otherwise.