[split] Re: TABOO TOPIC: Pornography/Erotica ||| Reliability of Wikipedia?

[pi]

Apologies for taking TABOO TOPIC: Pornography/Erotica off-topic, here is the split

dont read wikipedia. it is very 'Layman'. try accessing psychological reports about the issue. maybe refer to certain online textbooks on socioanthropology. you should find some. *if you can be bothered to do this at 12 am*

Wikipedia is actually excellent for many fields of study

[thushan]

dont read wikipedia. it is very 'Layman'. try accessing psychological reports about the issue. maybe refer to certain online textbooks on socioanthropology. you should find some. *if you can be bothered to do this at 12 am*

Wikipedia is actually excellent for many fields of study

Tell that to faculty

[pi]

dont read wikipedia. it is very 'Layman'. try accessing psychological reports about the issue. maybe refer to certain online textbooks on socioanthropology. you should find some. *if you can be bothered to do this at 12 am*

Wikipedia is actually excellent for many fields of study

Tell that to faculty

One of my tutors told me this actually

[thushan]

Dare you to quote Wikipedia in our next assignment then.

[pi]

Who says I haven't already?

Spoiler

I haven't xD

But seriously, my tutor said that it has really up-to-date information about diseases, biological responses, etc (for medicine); but similarly is very useful in other fields of study (maths for example).

[Art Vandelay]

I just use wikipedia for the references at the bottom lol. More a launchpad than anything for humanities-based subjects.

[Phy124]

I use wikipedia then reference the sites that wikipedia reference, I call it... referenception *dun* *dun* *dun*

[Art Vandelay]

We need to go deeper.

[JellyDonut]

If I want more references, I use the references in the references that Wikipedia referenced.

Research is fun