I was more disappointed to say the least. I recieved a raw study score of 37 for literature and estimated I would have at least attained a raw score of 40. There were two classes, one at my campus comprised with 12 year eleven students only and the other campus comprised of a class of 29, mixed with year eleven and twelve students. I had been excelling in literature all year, ranking first in my class and most likely ranking in the top 5 across both campuses. As a collective my class was quite weak. However, after looking at the high achievers list, I found no students from either campus had recieved a raw score of above 40. So, that leads me to believe no one got an A+ on the exam (I wish I did). I'm crushed about the fact my cohort was weak (not their fault) and the fact I couldn't get an A+ on the exam, which most likely would have raised my raw, given I was ranked first.
Hey! But I will say one thing, I thought I would have at least recieved a B+ on my exam. Was quite shocked and pleased with that A nonetheless.