Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

June 17, 2024, 06:02:21 am

Author Topic: Structures Q - Safety factors  (Read 646 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

anonuser0511

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • Respect: +1
Structures Q - Safety factors
« on: June 07, 2009, 11:44:31 pm »
0
A uniform beam of mass 1500kg is used as a cantilever as shown below. If the supports are made of wood and there is to be a safety factor of 6, what is the minimum cross-sectional area of each support?

ANS: 5.6E-4m^-2 (left) 6.1E.3m^2 to 1.9E-3 (right)
^wtf m^-2?

earlier in the book they have a table of Young's modulus for wood 1E9 - 1E10 Nm^-2 and then they have theses "strengths"  wood has a tensile strength of 4E7 Nm^-2 and compressive strength of 1E7 - 3.5E7 Nm^-2

so i'm guessing answer is wrong but how would you work out a safety factor Q - by multiplying the F in the stress by 6?

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Structures Q - Safety factors
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2009, 11:46:25 pm »
0
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

simplicity123

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: +1
Re: Structures Q - Safety factors
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2009, 08:31:11 am »
0
Correct me if im wrong, F1 is in tension and F2 is in compression. To apply the safety factors, u divide the tensile and compressive strengths by 6. That is the maximum allowable stress allowed on each support respectively. Then u go on to use ur stress formula for each support to find the cross sectional area.

anonuser0511

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • Respect: +1
Re: Structures Q - Safety factors
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2009, 10:58:39 am »
0
Awesome so i rearranged the formula and i got

     Safety Factor * Force
A =___________________
               MAX

So the answer i got for the above question was

LEFT: 5.625E-4m^2
RIGHT: 1.125E-2m^2 to 3.214E-3m^2

well answers agree with one of them eh, but then again they have m^-2, damn you Nelson! (3rd edition)