So in this part Fowler invites pyle to meet him for dinner after the plans he made with Monsieur Heng/Chou, where they told Fowler they'd talk to Pyle. So fowler does just that and then gives hom the choice of cancelling after feeling apprehensive of what'll happen to Pyle. But obvs Pyle sticks to the plan.
So the time comes and Fowler is at the Voux MOulin (their planned place to eat), and he books a table for one, knowing Pyle won't return because he's going to ve killed on the way as arranged by Heng/ Chou
Then Grange, comes along (he's having a party/drinking sesh with a group of Vietnamese men) and talks to Fowler about his son back in england having polio. Although Granger hates Fowler (and he admits it), he opens up to him b/c he speaks english and all. He tells Fowler that he cant go back to england to see his son as he needs to cover for another reporter. Fowlee offers to take his place but he cant as his accent is different to Granger, who's american. Granger thanks Fowler for his sympathy. Its after this that he says the quote i mentiones in the OP
Oh and please excuse any mistakes/grammatical errors. I'm on my phone atm!
Thanks.
I still believe what I said in my first post.
at the start fowler is critising pyle about his idealistic and 'school boy dreams" that he has of war. he makes fun of the fact that pyle thinks he knows all about war becomes he has read books of others interpretation. Fowler being older and supposedly wiser believes he does know war an the consequences of it as he has experienced it. but in the end he is just like pyle because he is helping to kill another.
Fowler then questions whether he too had 'school boy dreams" that were misguided and whether he or anyone can really understand war.
The quote also relates to the conflcit that occurs throughout the book of this notion between the young and the old. on the one hand there is pyle who is full of dreams and ideas about how to change the world but based on what he has read in books and not his oqn experiences, compared to fowler his is the ageing man with experience and knowledge behind him. in the end fowler is questioning whether there is really any difference between both, as in the end they are both at fault.
Hope that makes somewhat sense and it helps
Post here if you have any other questions about the the quiet american
