Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 04, 2025, 03:24:19 am

Author Topic: the confuzing part  (Read 5988 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lemollin

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2009, 08:40:33 pm »
So whats the concept behind this "stock gain" theory?

Apparently i put Credit Sales (Understated) and Cost of Sales (Understated), i understand that its a 3 marks question, but in a credit sales, stock gain isnt involved right?
« Last Edit: June 09, 2009, 08:48:59 pm by Lemollin »
VCE 08:
Chinese FL 3/4 - 26 (pretty much failed)

VCE 09 (hoping for):
English - 40+ raw
Methods - 50 raw
Specialist - 40+ raw
Accounting - 45+ raw
Chemistry - 40+ raw
Biology - 35+ raw

Aiming for Enter: 99+ hopefully
____________________________

Slacking much at the moment!

Flaming_Arrow

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #16 on: June 09, 2009, 08:44:45 pm »
just imagine i had 1000 left in the strock control account, i made a credit sale with cost of sales 200 but didnt record in my stock card it would say 1000 but i actually have 800 left, so when i do a physical stocktake it would say stock loss. but the trial balance had a stock gain which would mean its understated due to fact its actually a stock loss which would increase stock gain.

i hope that makes sense
« Last Edit: June 13, 2009, 10:07:30 pm by Flaming_Arrow »
2010: Commerce @ UoM

nbalakers24

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #17 on: June 09, 2009, 08:50:30 pm »
that makes perfect sense

damn lost the marks

monokekie

  • Guest
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #18 on: June 09, 2009, 08:50:56 pm »
but i thought this way,

you did a stock count with 800 stock on hand, stock card says 400, there are 400 stock gain.

(but if a credit sale of stock cost 100 is omitted, stock becomes overstated.)

so, the stock should be 300, stock gain should be 500.

stock gain should be 500, but only recorded as 400, isn't it understated?

phanphy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #19 on: June 09, 2009, 10:53:14 pm »
Actually yeah, stock gain.
Explains why it was 3 marks
2008: Classical Societies and Cultures
2009: Accounting, English, Legal, Further, Methods
2010: Commerce/Law @ Monash

phanphy

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2009, 11:41:27 am »
Hey, $20000 or 0 for bank balance (For CFS)?
2008: Classical Societies and Cultures
2009: Accounting, English, Legal, Further, Methods
2010: Commerce/Law @ Monash

Flaming_Arrow

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #21 on: June 10, 2009, 11:45:35 am »
Hey, $20000 or 0 for bank balance (For CFS)?

i duno i wrote $20 000 but i think it should be 0
2010: Commerce @ UoM

nbalakers24

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 672
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #22 on: June 10, 2009, 01:23:23 pm »
Hey, $20000 or 0 for bank balance (For CFS)?

i duno i wrote $20 000 but i think it should be 0

same

Flaming_Arrow

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2009, 04:47:11 pm »
but i thought this way,

you did a stock count with 800 stock on hand, stock card says 400, there are 400 stock gain.

(but if a credit sale of stock cost 100 is omitted, stock becomes overstated.)

so, the stock should be 300, stock gain should be 500.

stock gain should be 500, but only recorded as 400, isn't it understated?

yer i agree with you actually, it should be understated
2010: Commerce @ UoM

mtwtfss

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2009, 05:19:40 pm »
fmllll

turley

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #25 on: June 10, 2009, 06:19:26 pm »
im quite sure bank balance is zero. think about it, the business starts with $0. also the $20000 contribution is included in the $30000 sundries
VCE has ruined my life

turley

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #26 on: June 10, 2009, 06:22:32 pm »
it is stock gain.

let consider this fact - what possible two entries can fit in revenues?
we accept credit sales (or sales) is one. net profit, gross profit and adjusted gross profit dont belong (ie. the are revs - exps)
logically stock gain is the only one the fits, unless you want to try your luck as discount rev..
VCE has ruined my life

mtwtfss

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #27 on: June 10, 2009, 07:37:15 pm »
im quite sure bank balance is zero. think about it, the business starts with $0. also the $20000 contribution is included in the $30000 sundries

Hm..but if they contribute 20,000 on 1/1, bank balance on the 1/1 = 20,000

CFS asks for the balance as at 1/1, which is 20,000

thats what i hope it is anyway!

mtwtfss

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #28 on: June 10, 2009, 07:38:23 pm »
Any guesses at the A+ cut off?

monokekie

  • Guest
Re: the confuzing part
« Reply #29 on: June 11, 2009, 08:43:14 pm »
82/90