Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 22, 2025, 05:32:51 pm

Author Topic: homer's physics corner  (Read 13103 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#1procrastinator

  • Guest
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2013, 11:08:41 am »
+2
I'm having trouble understanding the concepts of apparent weight and weightlessness.
Suppose the normal force was greater than the gravity force would that mean the the person would feel lighter or heavier? also what happens to the apparent weight when a person is traveling in a lift? Thanks

Would feel heavier.
When it goes up you feel heavier cause the normal force increases (required to accelerate you up), when it goes down you feel lighter.

Chenpionn

  • Guest
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #16 on: February 10, 2013, 02:07:33 pm »
0
normal force = apparent weight. The greater the normal force, the heavier you feel. In the case of free fall, there is no normal force acting on you, only gravitational (9.8m/s^2 down) and so you feel weightless.

^correct me if I'm wrong :P

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #17 on: February 10, 2013, 02:41:01 pm »
0
normal force = apparent weight. The greater the normal force, the heavier you feel. In the case of free fall, there is no normal force acting on you, only gravitational (9.8m/s^2 down) and so you feel weightless.

^correct me if I'm wrong :P


Correcting you on something: in physics they use 10m/s^2 not 9.8m/s^2 unless specified for the latter in the question.



edit: typo said "on" twice :P
« Last Edit: February 10, 2013, 02:42:49 pm by pi »

Chenpionn

  • Guest
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #18 on: February 10, 2013, 04:23:08 pm »
0
right, my bad :) Guess I'm used to the Heinemann textbooks (they use 9.8m/s^2) 

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #19 on: March 04, 2013, 08:07:57 pm »
+1
having trouble with the electronics,

I can do the first but not the second row, also could you please explain the basics and how you got the answer. Thanks
Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?

availn

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 250
  • Respect: +13
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #20 on: March 04, 2013, 08:27:46 pm »
0
having trouble with the electronics,

I can do the first but not the second row, also could you please explain the basics and how you got the answer. Thanks

Pretty much, the higher the resistance of a resistor, the higher the voltage drop across it. When I say "high", I mean compared to the total resistance in the circuit.

Therefore, for voltage dividers, VR = Vsupply x (R/Rtotal)

Rtotal in this case is just R1 + R2

So for row 2, Vsupply is 20V, VR is 5V, and R is 1000ohms. The 1000ohm resistor drops a quarter of the voltage, so the other resistor must drop the remaining three-quarters; from this we can tell that this resistor is three times more resistive, and is 3000ohms.
2011: Software Development (43)
2012: Methods (41), Physics (45)
2013: Literature (38), German (35), Specialist (39), Accounting (40), UMEP Physics (4.5)
ATAR: 98.65

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #21 on: April 03, 2013, 09:22:16 pm »
+1
i need help me with these questions. i always get confused with such question

Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?

Phy124

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +464
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2013, 12:07:05 am »
0
If you're struggling with this question one way of going about it is to designate arbitrary values to the batteries and resistors and go from there. As you know the resistors are all the same value and the same for the batteries, too.

For simplicity's sake, let's say and

From here you can work out the current being supplied by the batteries in each case, the current through the resistors and the power dissipated in them, too.
2011
Mathematical Methods | Physics | Chemistry | English | Business Management

2012-2017
Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics and Bachelor of Civil Engineering (Honours) @ Monash University

Current
Transport Modeller @ Arup

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2013, 08:57:06 pm »
+1
could someone help me with a) and b)
Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #24 on: August 04, 2013, 09:31:00 pm »
+1
suppose you have a device which is designed to operate at optimum efficiency when it is connected to an AC supply that has a peak voltage of 170V and a frequency of 60hz. The lamp has an operating resistance of 100ohms.

How much power would this device be consuming when operating at optimum efficiency on
AC?
DC?

how do we calculate this? I know that we have to use p=v^2/r , but what values do i use for v in AC and DC. thanks
Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?

SocialRhubarb

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +34
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #25 on: August 04, 2013, 10:01:16 pm »
0
When using DC, you can directly apply the formula for power, , where V is the voltage drop across your lamp.

When using AC, you use the RMS value, which is kind of like an average. RMS voltage is your peak voltage divided by , which you can then use in your formula.
Fight me.

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #26 on: August 04, 2013, 10:47:57 pm »
0
Strictly speaking, you can have DC currents that vary with time as well; just think full-wave rectifiers that effectively take the absolute value of the AC signal, but as the current doesn't change direction, it's DC. Or, the electricity generated from a generator; varies with time, but it is DC. As far as I know, only currents from a battery are effectively constant.

As for which formula to use, the instantaneous power P = V^2/R where V is the voltage at that time.
We want averages though, so we need to average V^2/R. R is a constant, so we need the average of V^2. For an AC circuit, V = Vpeak * sin(2pi*t/T) where T is the period. You could probably prove, as an exercise, that the average value of V^2 = Vpeak^2 * sin^2(2pi*t/T) over an entire period is half of the peak voltage squared by integrating. Square-rooting this "average" yields the RMS value of Vpeak/sqrt 2.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

SocialRhubarb

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 313
  • Respect: +34
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #27 on: August 04, 2013, 11:52:58 pm »
0
In the context of the question, I think that DC would just be constant voltage.
Fight me.

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #28 on: August 17, 2013, 04:19:21 pm »
+1
how do they get the left side as the north end and the right as south? I get the opposite. How do we find these ends in a solenoid? Thanks
Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?

BasicAcid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
  • Respect: +135
Re: homer's physics corner
« Reply #29 on: August 17, 2013, 04:32:12 pm »
0
Always look at the inside of the solenoid.

Grab onto the wirewith your right hand with your thumb pointing in the arrow's direction (the current) and as you can see, you fingers curl to the left on the inside of the solenoid hence why that side is north.

It's called the right hand grip rule and the Heinemann textbook actually explains this pretty well.


« Last Edit: August 17, 2013, 04:39:32 pm by BasicAcid »