What are some points of comparisons between Maslow’s theory and Lawrence & Nohria’s theory? (Similarities and differences) Thanks! 
Maslow's motivational theory is one that places employees needs on a hierarchy. Managers must seek to fulfil a need before moving up to a higher order need in the hierarchy. Once a need in satisfied, it no longer acts as a motivator. Lawrence & Nohria's four drive theory states that employees are motivated by four key drives. These are the drive to acquire, the drive to bond, the drive to learn and the drive to defend. All these drives act upon an individual at the one time, however one drive may be more dominant then the others.
Similarities:- Both theories are satisfied through opportunities provided by management i.e Self-actualisation = Career advancement
& Drive to defend = Adequate grievance procedures (Source = Me)
- Both theories have a pursuit of satisfaction (Maslow = needs, L&N = Drives) (Source = Vic Uni lecture)
Differences:- Maslow's hierarchy of needs follows a sequential order, whereas the drives of Lawrence & Nohria's four drive theory act simultaneously. (Source = Me)
- Once an individuals need is satisfied in Maslow's hierarchy it no longer acts as a motivating force, where as Lawrence & Nohria's drives are continually motivating individuals (Source = Me)
- Maslow's theory has 5 levels wheras Lawrence & Nohria's has 4 drives (Source = Vic Uni lecture)