Also, putting forward a nutbag conspiracy theory that has been used to blame things on the JOOZ for more than a century doesn't reflect very well on you.
Implying someone is an anti-Semite merely because they implicate a powerful banking family in wars which are funded by banking, without mentioning the family's ethnicity. Touchy much? It seems you're very eager to bring ethnicity into things.
1. Maybe because the use of chemical weapons is a recognised breach of international weapons conventions and warrants intervention before more innocent lives are lost?
You know what else is a breach of international law? Committing an act of war against a nation without a UN Mandate.
US troops used White Phosphorous (arguably not a chemical weapon, still extremely deadly, indiscriminate and massively frowned upon in international circles) in the battle of Fallujah, should we order a cruise missile strike on Washington DC now? What about Israel's killing of non-combatants, does that warrant cruise missile strikes against Tel Aviv?
The Syrian Rebels (most of which are affiliated with Al-Nusra) have been supplied by the West and Turkey in particular. Many of the 'Rebels' are Islamists flooding in from Jordan and southern Turkey. Think about that...the USA, funding Al-Nusra.
Innocent lives eh? Like the Alawis murdered by the rebels purely for their religious affiliation?
Think logically for one minute. I implore you. Why would Assad set the perfect pretext for foreign invasion when he is winning the war against the Rebels anyway?
How about we wait for the adequate UN conclusions to be made before deciding on what we do?
_______________
As for the conspiracy itself, no one truly knows.
Home
Help
Search
Login
