Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 19, 2025, 02:37:08 am

Author Topic: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread  (Read 54519 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mafioso

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 180
  • Respect: +10
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #210 on: November 11, 2013, 07:09:03 pm »
0
Unit 3: 90/100
Unit 4: 96/100
Exam: 85/100

Study score?

38-40. Too hard to tell though.
Currently tutoring Business Management [50].  Spots open for 2015

Gavi

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Member
  • *
  • Posts: 0
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Leibler Yavneh College
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #211 on: November 11, 2013, 07:27:26 pm »
0
definately 40

Kuchiki

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 141
  • Respect: +17
  • School: Mount Waverley Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #212 on: November 11, 2013, 07:36:32 pm »
0
Yeah, personally, I agree. If its worth less than a $1, then definitely a Period Cost.

Not if the purchase price of each stock item was, like, under $5 or something. That's why it depends on percentages.
And since $2 is ~3% of $60, I'd say that's ample grounds for classifying it as a period cost.


BUT VCAA won't give marks for students who did include it and students who didn't like the Badging - One or the other, not both. Its probably those students who did include the $2 rebadging cost who will get the marks.

Since the follow-up question involves explaining your treatment of the rebadging cost, I believe they would give full marks if you were consistent with your previous answer and properly justified the approach you used.


Anyway, none of us can really predict which way the assessors will decide to go, but that's just what I think.
2011: Methods [44]
2012: Accounting [50] | Economics [47] | English Language [46] | Further [50] | Specialist [34] | ATAR: 99.80
2013-2016: Commerce Scholars Program/Economics (Accounting/Finance/Economics) @ Monash

TimmyC

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 143
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Lara Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #213 on: November 11, 2013, 07:44:10 pm »
+1
Had a quick peek at the solutions don't want to get to much info haha..

But it said buying expenses was a cost of goods sold... is this definite? As buying expenses seem a bit ambiguous.
Buying expenses is a cost incurred for bringing the stock item into the business. All costs involved in bringing a stock item into a sell-able state or location is part of cost of goods sold
2013: Accounting

2014: Methods, Spesh, Legal, Distance Ed Economics and English

Damoz.G

  • Guest
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #214 on: November 11, 2013, 07:48:53 pm »
+1
Buying expenses is a cost incurred for bringing the stock item into the business. All costs involved in bringing a stock item into a sell-able state or location is part of cost of goods sold

Yup. Good explanation. :D

It did make me think for a couple of seconds, and then I decided to included it because it obviously had something to do with BUYING Stock. I think the word "Buying" was the give away that should have been picked up on. :)

Uberjew

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 71
  • Respect: 0
  • School: McKinnon Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #215 on: November 11, 2013, 07:56:17 pm »
0
Don't think this is the place to discuss study scores :P
2012: Mathematical Methods: CAS [41] | IT: Software Development [39]

2013: English Language [31] | Specialist Maths [40] | Physics [39] | Accounting [42]

ATAR Goal: 97.00

Damoz.G

  • Guest
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #216 on: November 11, 2013, 07:57:24 pm »
0
Its not that I can't be bothered, its more that I don't feel comfortable predicting any Scores because its really hard to predict, especially with no benchmarks to go off. Also, I don't think we're allowed to ask for predictions on this thread. =/

dannynips

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Respect: -2
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #217 on: November 12, 2013, 07:13:14 pm »
0
Since this discussion has slowed ill ask now for a study score prediction.

2nd or 3rd in a reasonably strong cohort and a 90/100 on exam
2013: Maths Methods 44 | Accounting 45
2014: English Language | Specialists Maths | Physics
*Extension Accounting at Monash

nappch681

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
  • School: St Joseph's College Newtown
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #218 on: November 13, 2013, 12:33:46 pm »
0
this was an exam which had many little tricks to it which many people would have overlooked

an example after looking at the answers is question 8 with the stock gain which was seen as $250 if you just did figures and didn't include the drawings of stock by the owner which then boosted the gain to $550

Elts.Dam

  • Guest
Re: Accounting Exam Discussion Thread
« Reply #219 on: November 15, 2013, 06:32:32 pm »
0
After looking at the sample solutions posted, I have a few questions regarding the exam:
It would be great if you guys could answer them  :D

QST 3c) Was it necessary to discuss whether the owner was correct or not? I just disagreed and explained that if not all of the stock is sold at the end of the reporting period (i.e. 30th June), profit would be higher under product costing and lower under period costing, hence the owners statement is incorrect. I thought this would've been sufficient for a 3 mark question regarding the treatment of delivery charges.

QST 4a) Approximately how many marks would you lose for misinterpreting the question and putting the 5 damaged units of stock after the stock write down to $15 in the out column despite having no source document for the actual sale at the local market?

QST 4b) Approximately how many marks would you lose for recording one general journal entry, that is
DR STOCK WRITE DOWN - $560
CR STOCK CONTROL - $560

QST 10) I didn't pick up on that 50% of debtors pay in the month 'FOLLOWING A SALE" and thus subsequently calculated my answer as if 50% of Debtors pay in the month of the sale, 35% of debtors paying in the second month and 10% of debtors paying in the third month. I showed my calculations as such:

$40,000 x 0.5 = $20,000 x 1.1 = $22,000
$19,200 x 0.35 = $6720 x 1.1 = $7392
$28,000 x 0.1 = $2800 x 1.1 = 3080
=> Total Cash Received from debtors = $32,472

Would I get 1 mark at the least for showing knowledge that GST had to be added to each month?

These mistakes have been annoying me for the past few days, so thanks for your replies in advance ! :)