Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 20, 2025, 08:09:14 am

Author Topic: Legal Studies Exam Discussion  (Read 30005 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sam.utute

  • Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Connecturer.
  • Respect: +46
Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« on: November 12, 2013, 10:11:45 am »
+1
Hi all,

Please use this thread for all post-exam discussion.

Good luck to all of you this afternoon.

Wishing you all the best,
Sam :)

P.S. If you email me a copy of the exam, I will endeavour to create some suggested solutions.

Colokid

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • Respect: +1
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2013, 05:33:49 pm »
0
the exam was so easy!! hope everyone killed it :)
B.Com at Monash Uni [2014]

PM me if you wish to purchase my essential methods text book and 2013 Cambridge Methods Checkpoints (free postage!)

#COYG

xxbubblegum5

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Respect: 0
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2013, 05:36:37 pm »
0
I agree. It was definitely the easiest I have ever done! I was actually expecting the exam to be a lot harder.

uprising

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 104
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2013, 05:37:17 pm »
0
It wasn't the best exam I've ever done! The referendum question came out of nowhere, we hadn't discussed any successful ones in detail.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2013, 11:21:24 pm by uprising »
2012: Psychology
2013: Media, English, Legal Studies, Business Management, Food Tech

Flor

  • Guest
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2013, 05:38:29 pm »
0
I thought it was a decent exam. I didn't finish :(( I had two more sentences to go but noooooooooooooooooooooooo. Also, I didn't compare properly since I left like 15 mins for the question (sounds like a lot of time, but it srsly isn't)

edit: lol two, not to
« Last Edit: November 12, 2013, 05:43:40 pm by Flor »

MJRomeo81

  • Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1231
  • Princeps
  • Respect: +167
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2013, 05:42:05 pm »
0
Hopefully you guys did well.

Don't feel shattered if it didn't go as expected. I had a rough (and I mean really rough considering I was rank 1)  exam in 2011 but it still turned out good :)
Currently working in the IT Industry as an Oracle DBA (State Government)

Murphy was an optimist

Bachelor of Information Technology @ La Trobe (Melbourne) - Completed 2014
WAM: 91.96
The key, the whole key, and nothing but the key, so help me Codd.

Subjects I tutored during my time at LTU:
CSE2DBF (Database Fundamentals)
CSE1IS (Information Systems)
CSE2DES (System Design Engineering)

Quote
“If I had an hour to solve a problem I'd spend 55 minutes defining the problem and 5 minutes thinking about solutions.”
― Albert Einstein

asli95

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Gladstone Park Secondary College
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2013, 05:43:54 pm »
0
i stuffed up the reform question by giving a reform and an alternative  :'(

livfrost

  • Victorian
  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Respect: 0
  • School: our lady of mercy college
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2013, 05:53:28 pm »
0
Were we supposed to evaluate the last question, the 10 marker? I did but a lot of girls in my cohort didn't..

qpwo

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
  • School: St albans college
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2013, 05:57:57 pm »
0
damn for question 12 I used the wrong case for the high court interpretation, the worst thing is walking out knowing you knew the case but I just went blank when having to write it. that's 4 marks down the drain..

vashappenin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 905
  • Respect: +31
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2013, 06:01:25 pm »
+1
Oh my goodness thank you VCAA <3
That exam wasn't EASY so to speak, but I'm just soooooo relieved all my weak areas weren't tested: no civil pre trial procedures, no VLRC steps or examples, no doctrine of precedent, no recent changes/problems with the legal system. I didn't even revise these properly and thankfully they weren't on the exam :')

Started the extended response with half an hour left, and had time at the end to check over. My hand was hurting, but not enough to prevent me from writing so I'm just so grateful right now. I don't care how tough VCAA will mark or anything, I'm just happy that it's over now.

Off topic: NO MORE EXAMS FOR ME!! Oh gosh I'm so happy I could cry

Hope everyone else was happy :)
2013: English, Maths Methods, Further Maths, Legal Studies, HHD, Psychology
2014-present: Bachelor of Laws @ Monash University

Tutoring VCE English, Psych, Legal Studies and HHD in 2016! Tutoring via Skype too. PM me if you're interested :)

Evan.T

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: +3
  • School: Chairo Christian School
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2013, 06:03:12 pm »
0
In regard to the reform question, would it matter if you gave alternatives instead of reforms? Because I did, and I think that reforms could technically count as any change. I just forgot pretty much all 'reforms'. But technically a 'change in order to improve something', which is what the 'alternatives' are.

Coralista

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 83
  • Respect: +10
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2013, 06:03:58 pm »
0
damn for question 12 I used the wrong case for the high court interpretation, the worst thing is walking out knowing you knew the case but I just went blank when having to write it. that's 4 marks down the drain..

Did the same thing except realized half way through and had to cross out a whole page.

Which case did you use?
2012-2014: VCE (baccalaureate)
2015-2017: Bachelor of Commerce @ The University of Melbourne

lemdaddy

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Emmaus College
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2013, 06:06:33 pm »
0
i stuffed up the reform question by giving a reform and an alternative  :'(

Oh wow I just realised I did the same thing, used abolishing the jury as a reform. How on earth did I make that mistake

Dejan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 942
  • straya m8
  • Respect: +32
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2013, 06:09:44 pm »
0
Anxiously awaiting an upload of the exam :(

Evan.T

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Respect: +3
  • School: Chairo Christian School
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2013, 06:10:23 pm »
0
I didn't say abolishing the jury, but I more said modifying it. I then went on about specialist jury, so there is a jury but... and then about professional jurors, so there still is a jury...but people are paid to do it. Which is still a jury system, just reformed slightly. Technically reformed just means changed, and the study design doesn't stipulate what the reforms, so as long as it's a change, I'm hoping I'm okay. I know in the book it separately lists them as reforms and alternatives, but I think that's just silly as they essentially mean the same thing.