Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

July 18, 2025, 02:34:41 pm

Author Topic: Legal Studies Exam Discussion  (Read 29952 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

qpwo

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
  • School: St albans college
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2013, 06:10:47 pm »
0
Did the same thing except realized half way through and had to cross out a whole page.

Which case did you use?
I used the freedom of political communication one instead of franklin dam how about you did you write anything after you crossed it out?

vashappenin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 905
  • Respect: +31
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #16 on: November 12, 2013, 06:12:00 pm »
0
Someone will probably upload it by then, but I need to go to school tomorrow, and I want a copy of the exam so I might be able to upload it tomorrow if no one else has :)
2013: English, Maths Methods, Further Maths, Legal Studies, HHD, Psychology
2014-present: Bachelor of Laws @ Monash University

Tutoring VCE English, Psych, Legal Studies and HHD in 2016! Tutoring via Skype too. PM me if you're interested :)

Coralista

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 83
  • Respect: +10
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #17 on: November 12, 2013, 06:16:48 pm »
0
I used the freedom of political communication one instead of franklin dam how about you did you write anything after you crossed it out?

Yep that's what I wrote first, I used the Brislan case after I crossed it out but I didn't write nearly enough to get 8 marks
2012-2014: VCE (baccalaureate)
2015-2017: Bachelor of Commerce @ The University of Melbourne

qpwo

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
  • School: St albans college
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #18 on: November 12, 2013, 06:22:35 pm »
0
how much people to guys reckon get 100% in legal? does A+ A+ A+ guarantee 40 and above.

asli95

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Gladstone Park Secondary College
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #19 on: November 12, 2013, 06:23:41 pm »
0
Oh wow I just realised I did the same thing, used abolishing the jury as a reform. How on earth did I make that mistake

ugh its so depressing! it was so simple and yet i screwed it up

Dejan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 942
  • straya m8
  • Respect: +32
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #20 on: November 12, 2013, 06:28:29 pm »
0
how much people to guys reckon get 100% in legal? does A+ A+ A+ guarantee 40 and above.
The lowest study score that achievable with 3 A+'s is 38 (from what I heard) so there's some possibility that you won't get a 40+ but you're in for a chance depending how high or low your A+ is.

michak

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 667
  • Respect: +21
  • School: Westbourne Grammar School
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2013, 06:29:17 pm »
+1
The lowest study score that achievable with 3 A+'s is 38 (from what I heard) so there's some possibility that you won't get a 40+ but you're in for a chance depending how high or low your A+ is.

Yeah not true I got A+, A+ and A and got 42.
2011: Bio [36]
2012: Legal [42] PE [43] Chem [33] English [40] Methods [25] 
ATAR: 93.30
2013: B. Arts at Monash University
2014: Bachelor of Laws/Bachelor of Arts at Monash

sam.utute

  • Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Connecturer.
  • Respect: +46
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #22 on: November 12, 2013, 06:31:30 pm »
0
how much people to guys reckon get 100% in legal? does A+ A+ A+ guarantee 40 and above.

Straight A+s guarantees anywhere between 38-50.

Dejan

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 942
  • straya m8
  • Respect: +32
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #23 on: November 12, 2013, 06:32:19 pm »
0
Yeah not true I got A+, A+ and A and got 42.
Well I apologize for providing misleading information

jpf299

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Respect: 0
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #24 on: November 12, 2013, 06:33:14 pm »
0
lol easy

tcstudent

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
  • Respect: +2
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #25 on: November 12, 2013, 06:40:01 pm »
0
This question was hard to elaborate on:
Q5B) about parliament cannot make laws that override decisions made by the supreme court of victoria??

is this statement correct or incorrect??

i said this is incorrect,

Flor

  • Guest
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #26 on: November 12, 2013, 06:42:26 pm »
0
This question was hard to elaborate on:
Q5B) about parliament cannot make laws that override decisions made by the supreme court of victoria??

is this statement correct or incorrect??

i said this is incorrect,

Pretty sure incorrect*
Parliament has supreme law making power to abrogate common law. It just can't override the decision of the HC in constitutional cases
« Last Edit: November 12, 2013, 06:45:14 pm by Flor »

vashappenin

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 905
  • Respect: +31
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #27 on: November 12, 2013, 06:45:56 pm »
0
Omg I blanked out on that question and said something similar :/ whoops!
2013: English, Maths Methods, Further Maths, Legal Studies, HHD, Psychology
2014-present: Bachelor of Laws @ Monash University

Tutoring VCE English, Psych, Legal Studies and HHD in 2016! Tutoring via Skype too. PM me if you're interested :)

tcstudent

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
  • Respect: +2
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #28 on: November 12, 2013, 06:46:35 pm »
0
Pretty sure it's true.
Parliament has supreme law making power to abrogate common law. It just can't override the decision of the HC in constitutional cases

DUDE, what????

it says the supreme court not high court??

NickGeo34

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Nossal High School
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Legal Studies Exam Discussion
« Reply #29 on: November 12, 2013, 06:48:02 pm »
0
Such a great exam, I loved it. So glad that there was hardly anything on pre-trial procedure or operation of the doctrine of precedent. The VCAT question did trip me up a bit though...
2012: I.T Applications [42]

2013: English [33] Chemistry [31] Legal Studies [37] Methods [32] Physics [32] ATAR: 85.85

2014 - Present: Information Systems/Laws - Deakin University